Dealing with dilemmas in daily clinical practice: The development and evaluation of the seminar "suddenly, at the hospital" aimed at promoting professional identity formation in the final practical year of undergraduate medical education

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Kristina Schick - , Institute of Medical Education, Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Verena Kantenwein - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM) (Author)
  • Moritz Schumm - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Teresa Bertram - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Marie-Christine Fritzsche - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Nikolaos Sapoutzis - , Institute of Medical Education, Gesundheitsamt Hochtaunuskreis (Author)
  • Christopher Holzmann-Littig - , Nephrocare Friedberg GmbH (Author)
  • Marjo Wijnen-Meijer - , Institute of Medical Education, Technical University of Munich (Author)

Abstract

AIM: In everyday clinical practice, (future) physicians are confronted with dilemmas for which there are no clear solutions and which cannot be solved using clinical knowledge alone. To prepare medical students for such situations and support their formation of a professional identity, we developed a seminar that didactically applies elements of case-based clinical reasoning and storification to situations and potential professional strategies (medical professionalism).

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An interdisciplinary working group generated 28 ideas for cases depicting clinical dilemmas. These case ideas were assigned to five categories: Patient, colleague, supervisor, relatives, and self. These case ideas were then presented to medical students. A course concept was developed for the case idea in each category that garnered the highest level of interest. To develop the seminar sessions, teaching strategies were selected which encouraged reflection and participation. The course evaluation was carried out using a questionnaire.

RESULTS: The five seminar topics dealt with (1) no medical insurance (patient), (2) covering up a complication in medical treatment (colleague), (3) medical confidentiality (relatives), (4) conflict of roles (supervisor), and (5) romantic feelings toward patients (self). The seminar entailed five sessions, each one consisting of four teaching units. The course evaluations (N=16 practical-year (PY) students; age: M=26.50; SD=2.83; female: n=13) registered a high level of satisfaction among the students in regard to the course content and pedagogical approach.

CONCLUSION: It was possible to successfully design and implement a course concept interlinking case-based clinical reasoning, storification and medical professionalism. The seminar enabled students to get a grasp on situations that go beyond clinical knowledge and develop strategies.

Translated title of the contribution
Umgang mit Dilemmata im klinischen Alltag
:
Die Entwicklung und Evaluation des Seminars „Plötzlich in der Klinik“ zur Förderung der professionellen Identitätsentwicklung im Praktischen Jahr

Details

Original languageMultiple
Article numberDoc29
JournalGMS Journal for Medical Education
Volume43
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2026
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC13054812
ORCID /0000-0002-4819-4604/work/217239314

Keywords

Keywords

  • Humans, Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical/psychology, Curriculum/trends, Professionalism/education, Female, Male, Ethical Dilemmas