The current state of facial prosthetics - A multicenter analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Oliver C. Thiele - , Klinikum Ludwigshafen (Author)
  • Jörn Brom - , Brom Epithetik (Author)
  • Anton Dunsche - , City Hospital Karlsruhe (Author)
  • Michael Ehrenfeld - , Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Author)
  • Philippe Federspil - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • Bernhard Frerich - , Rostock University Medical Centre (Author)
  • Frank Hölzle - , RWTH Aachen University (Author)
  • Martin Klein - , Special Clinics Hornheide (Author)
  • Matthias Kreppel - , University of Cologne (Author)
  • Alexander C. Kübler - , University of Würzburg (Author)
  • Norbert R. Kübler - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Martin Kunkel - , Ruhr University Bochum (Author)
  • Johannes Kuttenberger - , Kantonsspital Luzern (Author)
  • Günter Lauer - , Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Author)
  • Boris Mayer - , Klinikum Ludwigshafen (Author)
  • Christopher Mohr - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Andreas Neff - , University of Marburg (Author)
  • Michael Rasse - , Innsbruck Medical University (Author)
  • Rudolf H. Reich - , University of Bonn (Author)
  • Siegmar Reinert - , University Hospital Tübingen (Author)
  • Daniel Rothamel - , University of Cologne (Author)
  • Robert Sader - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Henning Schliephake - , University of Göttingen (Author)
  • Rainer Schmelzeisen - , University Medical Center Freiburg (Author)
  • Alexander Schramm - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Peter Sieg - , Kiel University (Author)
  • Hendrik Terheyden - , Helios Clinics Kassel (Author)
  • Jörg Wiltfang - , University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel (Author)
  • Christoph M. Ziegler - , St Olavs' University Hospital (Author)
  • Robert A. Mischkowski - , Klinikum Ludwigshafen (Author)
  • Joachim E. Zöller - , University of Cologne (Author)

Abstract

Even though modern surgical techniques are dominating reconstructive facial procedures, the capability to use facial epitheses for reconstruction is still an important skill for the maxillofacial surgeon. We present an international multicenter analysis to clarify which techniques are used to fixate facial prostheses. We contacted all maxillofacial departments in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Norway which were registered with the German society for oral and maxillofacial surgery (DGMKG). These centers were asked via electronical mail to provide information on the type of epithesis fixation systems currently in use. The return rate from 58 departments was 43.1% (n = 25). Overall, implant fixation was the preferred fixation system (92%). Plates were the second most common fixation technique (32%). No centers reported the standard use of non-invasive fixation techniques for permanent epithesis fixation. The main retention systems in use were magnets (24/25), other retention systems are used much less often. The current preferred fixation technique for facial epitheses consists of implant-based, magnet-fixated epitheses. For nasal prostheses, a plate-based, magnet-fixated system is often used.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1038-1041
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume43
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 26054445

Keywords

Keywords

  • Anaplastology, Facial epithesis, Facial prosthesis, Maxillofacial surgery, Plastic and reconstructive surgery