Temporal Trends in Urinary Diversion among Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy Between 1986 and 2022: Experience at the University Medical Center Mainz with 2224 Cases

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Gregor Duwe - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Mohamed M Kamal - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Crispin Wiesmann - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Katarzyna E Banasiewicz - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Isabel Wagner - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Nikita Dhruva Fischer - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Maximilian Haack - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Lisa Johanna Frey - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Rene Mager - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Thomas Höfner - , Ordensklinikum Linz (Author)
  • Peter Sparwasser - , University Hospital Tübingen (Author)
  • Igor Tsaur - , University Hospital Tübingen (Author)
  • Christoph Wiesner - , Hospital Osnabrück (Author)
  • Christian Thomas - , Department of Urology (Author)
  • Joachim Wolfgang Thüroff - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Rudolf Hohenfellner - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Maximilian Peter Brandt - , University Medical Center Mainz (Joint last author)
  • Axel Haferkamp - , University Medical Center Mainz (Joint last author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of temporal trends of urinary diversion (UD) and identification of predictive factors for continent urinary diversion (CUD) in patients with bladder cancer (BC) is scarce and data on large cohorts are missing. We aimed to describe longitudinal temporal trends and predictive factors for UD among patients with BC receiving radical cystectomy (RC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed institutional data collected from patients undergoing RC from 1986 to 2022 to describe changes in patients' characteristics and UD. Primary end points were patients' characteristics associated with type of UD. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictive factors for CUD.

RESULTS: In total, 2224 patients (77.16% male, 22.84% female) with a mean age of 66 years [standard deviation (SD), 10.64 years] were included. We observed an increase in mean age from 59.86 (10.8) years (1986-1990) to 69.85 (9.99) years (2016-2022) (p < 0.001). The proportion of CUD gradually declined from 43.72% (94/215; 1986-1990) to 18.38% (86/468; 2016-2022). Patients who were male [odds ratio (OR): 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43-2.57, p < 0.001), younger (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.87-0.89, p < 0.001) and had no hydronephrosis prior to RC (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.66-2.92, p < 0.001) were more likely to receive CUD.

CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest European single-center cohort of UD after RC, demonstrating a significant shift from CUD to IUD, accompanied by an increasing age. Finally, our data mirrors the development and extensive experience with the Mainz Pouch-I in the 1980's and 1990's together with other colon pouches.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7220-7228
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of surgical oncology
Volume31
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC11413057
Scopus 85197726893

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data, Aged, Cystectomy/methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery, Urinary Diversion/trends, Urinary Reservoirs, Continent

Library keywords