Temporal Trends in Urinary Diversion among Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy Between 1986 and 2022: Experience at the University Medical Center Mainz with 2224 Cases

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Gregor Duwe - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Mohamed M Kamal - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Crispin Wiesmann - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Katarzyna E Banasiewicz - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Isabel Wagner - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Nikita Dhruva Fischer - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Maximilian Haack - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Lisa Johanna Frey - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Rene Mager - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Höfner - , Ordensklinikum Linz (Autor:in)
  • Peter Sparwasser - , Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Igor Tsaur - , Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Christoph Wiesner - , Klinikum Osnabrück (Autor:in)
  • Christian Thomas - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie (Autor:in)
  • Joachim Wolfgang Thüroff - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Rudolf Hohenfellner - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Maximilian Peter Brandt - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Gemeinsame:r Letztautor:in)
  • Axel Haferkamp - , Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Gemeinsame:r Letztautor:in)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of temporal trends of urinary diversion (UD) and identification of predictive factors for continent urinary diversion (CUD) in patients with bladder cancer (BC) is scarce and data on large cohorts are missing. We aimed to describe longitudinal temporal trends and predictive factors for UD among patients with BC receiving radical cystectomy (RC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed institutional data collected from patients undergoing RC from 1986 to 2022 to describe changes in patients' characteristics and UD. Primary end points were patients' characteristics associated with type of UD. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictive factors for CUD.

RESULTS: In total, 2224 patients (77.16% male, 22.84% female) with a mean age of 66 years [standard deviation (SD), 10.64 years] were included. We observed an increase in mean age from 59.86 (10.8) years (1986-1990) to 69.85 (9.99) years (2016-2022) (p < 0.001). The proportion of CUD gradually declined from 43.72% (94/215; 1986-1990) to 18.38% (86/468; 2016-2022). Patients who were male [odds ratio (OR): 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43-2.57, p < 0.001), younger (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.87-0.89, p < 0.001) and had no hydronephrosis prior to RC (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.66-2.92, p < 0.001) were more likely to receive CUD.

CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest European single-center cohort of UD after RC, demonstrating a significant shift from CUD to IUD, accompanied by an increasing age. Finally, our data mirrors the development and extensive experience with the Mainz Pouch-I in the 1980's and 1990's together with other colon pouches.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)7220-7228
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftAnnals of surgical oncology
Jahrgang31
Ausgabenummer10
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Okt. 2024
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMedCentral PMC11413057
Scopus 85197726893

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data, Aged, Cystectomy/methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery, Urinary Diversion/trends, Urinary Reservoirs, Continent

Bibliotheksschlagworte