Research Reality in Neuroradiology: a Survey Analysis at German University Hospitals

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Béatrice Maxime von Tresckow - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Katharina Schregel - , Jena University Hospital (Author)
  • Sarah Schlaeger - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM), Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich (Author)
  • Daniel P O Kaiser - , Institute and Polyclinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (Author)
  • Roland Schwab - , University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg (Author)
  • Daniel Weiss - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • David Zopfs - , University Hospital Aachen (Author)
  • Elke Hattingen - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Ansgar Berlis - , University Hospital Augsburg (Author)
  • Peter Schramm - , University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck (Author)
  • Katharina J Wenger - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide a representative overview of the current research conditions in neuroradiology at German hospitals.

METHODS: In 2024, the German Society of Neuroradiology (DGNR) conducted an anonymous online survey targeting neuroradiology researchers working at German hospitals. Participants were recruited via targeted e-mail-outreach and professional social media channels. Data were collected using the Easyfeedback platform. A total of 60 individuals participated, of whom 33 completed the full 33-item questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS: Among respondents who completed the survey, 50% reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their current research conditions. Respondents from non-independent departments expressed more dissatisfaction than those of independent institutes. Major challenges for researchers included insufficient research time, lack of funding, and limited infrastructure. Scientific work was most frequently conducted alongside clinical duties or during personal time, while only a minority of respondents reported receiving continuousely protected research time. Intramural university funding represented the most common funding source. Any type of structured research program was available at approximately half of the institutions. Mentoring opportunities within these programs were reported by a majority of respondents, with generally positive evaluations and corresponding higher satisfaction with research conditions.

CONCLUSION: Structural independence, expanding protected research time, improving funding opportunities, and promoting structured research and mentoring programs appear essential to ensure sustainable academic development and innovation in the field.

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical neuroradiology
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Jan 2026
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 105028853083
ORCID /0000-0001-5258-0025/work/210355608

Keywords

Keywords

  • Clinician scientist, DGNR, Mentoring, Research satisfaction, Structural independence