Research Reality in Neuroradiology: a Survey Analysis at German University Hospitals

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Béatrice Maxime von Tresckow - , Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (Autor:in)
  • Katharina Schregel - , Universitätsklinikum Jena (Autor:in)
  • Sarah Schlaeger - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM), Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München (Autor:in)
  • Daniel P O Kaiser - , Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (Autor:in)
  • Roland Schwab - , Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Weiss - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • David Zopfs - , Universitätsklinikum Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Elke Hattingen - , Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (Autor:in)
  • Ansgar Berlis - , Universitätsklinikum Augsburg (Autor:in)
  • Peter Schramm - , Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck (Autor:in)
  • Katharina J Wenger - , Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (Autor:in)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide a representative overview of the current research conditions in neuroradiology at German hospitals.

METHODS: In 2024, the German Society of Neuroradiology (DGNR) conducted an anonymous online survey targeting neuroradiology researchers working at German hospitals. Participants were recruited via targeted e-mail-outreach and professional social media channels. Data were collected using the Easyfeedback platform. A total of 60 individuals participated, of whom 33 completed the full 33-item questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS: Among respondents who completed the survey, 50% reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their current research conditions. Respondents from non-independent departments expressed more dissatisfaction than those of independent institutes. Major challenges for researchers included insufficient research time, lack of funding, and limited infrastructure. Scientific work was most frequently conducted alongside clinical duties or during personal time, while only a minority of respondents reported receiving continuousely protected research time. Intramural university funding represented the most common funding source. Any type of structured research program was available at approximately half of the institutions. Mentoring opportunities within these programs were reported by a majority of respondents, with generally positive evaluations and corresponding higher satisfaction with research conditions.

CONCLUSION: Structural independence, expanding protected research time, improving funding opportunities, and promoting structured research and mentoring programs appear essential to ensure sustainable academic development and innovation in the field.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
FachzeitschriftClinical neuroradiology
PublikationsstatusElektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung - 28 Jan. 2026
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 105028853083
ORCID /0000-0001-5258-0025/work/210355608

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Clinician scientist, DGNR, Mentoring, Research satisfaction, Structural independence