Pretreatment quality of life, performance status and their relation to treatment discontinuation and treatment changes in high-risk breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: results from the prospective randomized ADEBAR trial

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Martin Eichler - , University Cancer Centre Dresden, University Medical Center Mainz , Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Author)
  • Susanne Singer - , Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Author)
  • Wolfgang Janni - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Nadia Harbeck - , Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Author)
  • Brigitte Rack - , Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Author)
  • Doris Augustin - , DONAU ISAR Klinikum Deggendorf-Dingolfing-Landau gKU (Author)
  • Arthur Wischnik - , University Hospital Augsburg (Author)
  • Marion Kiechle - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Johannes Ettl - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Christoph Scholz - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Visnja Fink - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Lukas Schwentner - , Ulm University (Author)

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life (QoL) is a self-assessed construct indicating how people feel in regard to aspects of their health. Performance status (PS) is evaluated by the treating physician. We examined whether pretreatment QoL and PS are related to subsequent treatment discontinuation and treatment changes in high-risk breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study with data from a randomized phase III trial comparing FEC- and EC-DOC-chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer (ADEBAR). We examined the patient’s request to discontinue the study, discontinuation due to toxicity, the prolongation of therapy, and dose reduction. Baseline QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30. PS was evaluated using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Scale (ECOG). Four QoL scales were selected prior to analysis as outcomes: global health, physical functioning, emotional functioning, and fatigue. Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to test for differences within the independent variables. Main results: 1322 patients were included. 1094 (82.8 %) patients completed therapy according to protocol. 6.3 % stopped therapy due to toxicity and 4.4 % refused treatment. Global health was not related to any of the four QoL outcomes. Physical functioning had the strongest impact on QoL, when comparing the fittest group to the lowest quintile [OR 2.14 (95 % CI 1.00–4.60)]. ECOG 0 compared to worse than 1 was strongly correlated to therapy discontinuation due to toxicity [OR 20.15 (95 % CI 9.48–42.83)] and treatment refusal [OR 8.32 (95 % CI 3.81–18.14)]. Conclusions: Pretreatment QoL, especially physical functioning, is associated with subsequent therapy discontinuation due to toxicity and with changes of the treatment protocol. Pretreatment performance status is strongly associated with therapy discontinuation due to toxicity and with treatment refusal.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-325
Number of pages7
Journal Breast cancer : the journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 27262301
ORCID /0000-0001-9654-2207/work/142254155

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Breast cancer, Chemotherapy, Performance status, Quality of life, Treatment discontinuation