Performance of Antinuclear Antibodies for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Regression of Diagnostic Data

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • On behalf of the SLE Classification Criteria Steering Committee - (Author)
  • Nicolai Leuchten - , Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Annika Hoyer - , German Diabetes Center Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Ralph Brinks - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Monika Schoels - , Klinik Hietzing (Author)
  • Matthias Schneider - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Josef Smolen - , Medical University of Vienna (Author)
  • Sindhu R. Johnson - , University of Toronto (Author)
  • David Daikh - , University of California at San Francisco (Author)
  • Thomas Dörner - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Martin Aringer - , Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • George Bertsias - , University of Crete (Author)

Abstract

Objective: To review the published literature on the performance of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)–HEp-2 antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published between January 1990 and October 2015. The research question was structured according to Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) format rules, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations were followed where appropriate. Meta-regression analysis for diagnostic tests was performed, using the ANA titer as independent variable, while sensitivity and specificity were dependent variables. Results: Of 4,483 publications screened, 62 matched the eligibility criteria, and another 2 articles were identified through reference analysis. The included studies comprised 13,080 SLE patients in total, of whom 12,542 (95.9%) were reported to be IIF-ANA positive at various titers. For ANA at titers of 1:40, 1:80, 1:160, and 1:320, meta-regression gave sensitivity values of 98.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 97.6–99.0%), 97.8% (95% CI 96.8–98.5%), 95.8% (95% CI 94.1–97.1%), and 86.0% (95% CI 77.0–91.9%), respectively. The corresponding specificities were 66.9% (95% CI 57.8–74.9%), 74.7% (95% CI 66.7–81.3%), 86.2% (95% CI 80.4–90.5%), and 96.6% (95% CI 93.9–98.1%), respectively. Conclusion: The results of this systematic literature review and meta-regression confirm that IIF-ANAs have high sensitivity for SLE. ANAs at a titer of 1:80 have sufficiently high sensitivity to be considered as an entry criterion for SLE classification criteria, i.e., formally test other classification criteria for SLE only if ANAs of at least 1:80 have been found.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-438
Number of pages11
JournalArthritis care & research
Volume70
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85041234022
PubMed 28544593
ORCID /0000-0002-9348-5259/work/182335880

Keywords