Performance of Antinuclear Antibodies for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Regression of Diagnostic Data

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • On behalf of the SLE Classification Criteria Steering Committee - (Autor:in)
  • Nicolai Leuchten - , Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Annika Hoyer - , Deutsche Diabetes-Zentrum (DDZ) - Leibniz-Zentrum für Diabetes-Forschung (Autor:in)
  • Ralph Brinks - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Monika Schoels - , Klinik Hietzing (Autor:in)
  • Matthias Schneider - , Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Josef Smolen - , Medizinische Universität Wien (Autor:in)
  • Sindhu R. Johnson - , University of Toronto (Autor:in)
  • David Daikh - , University of California at San Francisco (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Dörner - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Autor:in)
  • Martin Aringer - , Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • George Bertsias - , Universität Kreta (Autor:in)

Abstract

Objective: To review the published literature on the performance of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)–HEp-2 antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published between January 1990 and October 2015. The research question was structured according to Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) format rules, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations were followed where appropriate. Meta-regression analysis for diagnostic tests was performed, using the ANA titer as independent variable, while sensitivity and specificity were dependent variables. Results: Of 4,483 publications screened, 62 matched the eligibility criteria, and another 2 articles were identified through reference analysis. The included studies comprised 13,080 SLE patients in total, of whom 12,542 (95.9%) were reported to be IIF-ANA positive at various titers. For ANA at titers of 1:40, 1:80, 1:160, and 1:320, meta-regression gave sensitivity values of 98.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 97.6–99.0%), 97.8% (95% CI 96.8–98.5%), 95.8% (95% CI 94.1–97.1%), and 86.0% (95% CI 77.0–91.9%), respectively. The corresponding specificities were 66.9% (95% CI 57.8–74.9%), 74.7% (95% CI 66.7–81.3%), 86.2% (95% CI 80.4–90.5%), and 96.6% (95% CI 93.9–98.1%), respectively. Conclusion: The results of this systematic literature review and meta-regression confirm that IIF-ANAs have high sensitivity for SLE. ANAs at a titer of 1:80 have sufficiently high sensitivity to be considered as an entry criterion for SLE classification criteria, i.e., formally test other classification criteria for SLE only if ANAs of at least 1:80 have been found.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)428-438
Seitenumfang11
FachzeitschriftArthritis care & research
Jahrgang70
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - März 2018
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85041234022
PubMed 28544593
ORCID /0000-0002-9348-5259/work/182335880

Schlagworte