Management of high-risk acute pulmonary embolism: an emulated target trial analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • High-risk Investigator Group - (Author)
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology (at Dresden Heart Centre)
  • University Hospital Regensburg
  • University Hospitals Leuven
  • Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
  • University Medical Center Freiburg
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Martin Luther University Hospital
  • Jena University Hospital
  • University Medical Center Göttingen
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
  • German Center for Cardiovascular Disease (DZHK) Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck
  • University Hospital Münster
  • University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf
  • Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • CIBER - Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV)
  • SS. Antonio e Biagio and Cesare Arrigo - Alessandria
  • Heart Center Dresden University Hospital
  • Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology (at Dresden Heart Centre)
  • University Hospital Cologne
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • University Hospital Duesseldorf
  • German Heart Centre Munich
  • German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner site Munich
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck
  • University of Bonn Medical Center
  • Heart Center Leipzig
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)
  • CIBER - Respiratory Diseases
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • São João Hospital
  • Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
  • University of Pavia
  • IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo - Pavia
  • Klinikum Ludwigshafen
  • University Medical Center Mainz
  • Innsbruck Medical University

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition necessitating hemodynamic stabilization and rapid restoration of pulmonary perfusion. In this context, evidence regarding the benefit of advanced circulatory support and pulmonary recanalization strategies is still limited.

METHODS: In this observational study, we assessed data of 1060 patients treated for high-risk acute PE with 991 being included in a target trial emulation to investigate all-cause in-hospital mortality estimates with different advanced treatment strategies. The four treatment groups consisted of patients undergoing (I) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) alone (n = 126), (II) intrahospital systemic thrombolysis (SYS) (n = 643), (III) surgical thrombectomy (ST) (n = 49), and (IV) percutaneous catheter-directed treatment (PCDT) (n = 173). VA-ECMO was allowed as bridging to pulmonary recanalization in groups II, III, and IV. Marginal causal contrasts were estimated using the g-formula with logistic regression models as the primary approach. Sensitivity analyses included targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) with machine learning, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), as well as variations of estimands, handling of missing values, and a complete target trial emulation excluding the VA-ECMO alone group.

RESULTS: In the overall target trial population, the median age was 62.0 years, and 53.3% of patients were male. The estimated probability of in-hospital mortality from the primary target trial intention-to-treat analysis for VA-ECMO alone was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47%; 67%), compared to 48% (95% CI 44%; 53%) for intrahospital SYS, 34% (95%CI 18%; 50%) for ST, and 43% (95% CI 35%; 51%) for PCDT. The mortality risk ratios were largely in favor of any advanced recanalization strategy over VA-ECMO alone. The robustness of these findings was supported by all sensitivity analyses. In the crude outcome analysis, patients surviving to discharge had a high probability of favorable neurologic outcome in all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION: Advanced recanalization by means of SYS, ST, and several promising catheter-directed systems may have a positive impact on short-term survival of patients presenting with high-risk PE compared to the use of VA-ECMO alone as a bridge to recovery.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)490-505
Number of pages16
JournalIntensive care medicine
Volume51
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC12018524
Scopus 86000032055
ORCID /0000-0003-3953-3253/work/203072279

Keywords

Keywords

  • Acute Disease, Aged, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Embolism/therapy, Thrombectomy/methods, Thrombolytic Therapy/methods, Systemic thrombolysis, High-risk pulmonary embolism, Percutaneous catheter-directed treatment, Mechanical circulatory support, Surgical thrombectomy