Management of high-risk acute pulmonary embolism: an emulated target trial analysis

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • High-risk Investigator Group - (Autor:in)
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie
  • Klinik für Innere Medizin und Kardiologie (am Herzzentrum)
  • Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Leuven
  • Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
  • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)
  • Universitätsklinikum Halle
  • Universitätsklinikum Jena
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) - Standort Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
  • CIBER - Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV)
  • SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo - Alessandria
  • Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH – Universitätsklinik
  • Klinik für Innere Medizin und Kardiologie (am Herzzentrum)
  • Universitätsklinikum Köln
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum München
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) - Standort München
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck
  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn
  • Herzzentrum Leipzig
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
  • Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)
  • CIBER - Enfermedades Respiratorias
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • São João Hospital
  • Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
  • Università degli Studi di Pavia
  • IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo - Pavia
  • Klinikum Ludwigshafen
  • Universitätsmedizin Mainz
  • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition necessitating hemodynamic stabilization and rapid restoration of pulmonary perfusion. In this context, evidence regarding the benefit of advanced circulatory support and pulmonary recanalization strategies is still limited.

METHODS: In this observational study, we assessed data of 1060 patients treated for high-risk acute PE with 991 being included in a target trial emulation to investigate all-cause in-hospital mortality estimates with different advanced treatment strategies. The four treatment groups consisted of patients undergoing (I) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) alone (n = 126), (II) intrahospital systemic thrombolysis (SYS) (n = 643), (III) surgical thrombectomy (ST) (n = 49), and (IV) percutaneous catheter-directed treatment (PCDT) (n = 173). VA-ECMO was allowed as bridging to pulmonary recanalization in groups II, III, and IV. Marginal causal contrasts were estimated using the g-formula with logistic regression models as the primary approach. Sensitivity analyses included targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) with machine learning, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), as well as variations of estimands, handling of missing values, and a complete target trial emulation excluding the VA-ECMO alone group.

RESULTS: In the overall target trial population, the median age was 62.0 years, and 53.3% of patients were male. The estimated probability of in-hospital mortality from the primary target trial intention-to-treat analysis for VA-ECMO alone was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47%; 67%), compared to 48% (95% CI 44%; 53%) for intrahospital SYS, 34% (95%CI 18%; 50%) for ST, and 43% (95% CI 35%; 51%) for PCDT. The mortality risk ratios were largely in favor of any advanced recanalization strategy over VA-ECMO alone. The robustness of these findings was supported by all sensitivity analyses. In the crude outcome analysis, patients surviving to discharge had a high probability of favorable neurologic outcome in all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION: Advanced recanalization by means of SYS, ST, and several promising catheter-directed systems may have a positive impact on short-term survival of patients presenting with high-risk PE compared to the use of VA-ECMO alone as a bridge to recovery.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)490-505
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftIntensive care medicine
Jahrgang51
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - März 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMedCentral PMC12018524
Scopus 86000032055
ORCID /0000-0003-3953-3253/work/203072279

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Acute Disease, Aged, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Embolism/therapy, Thrombectomy/methods, Thrombolytic Therapy/methods, Systemic thrombolysis, High-risk pulmonary embolism, Percutaneous catheter-directed treatment, Mechanical circulatory support, Surgical thrombectomy