"History, Theory and Ethics of Medicine": The Last Ten Years. A Survey of Course Content, Methods and Structural Preconditions at Twenty-nine German Medical Faculties

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Jan Schildmann - , Ruhr University Bochum (Author)
  • Florian Bruns - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Volker Hess - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Jochen Vollmann - , Ruhr University Bochum (Author)

Abstract

Objective: "History, Theory, Ethics of Medicine" (German: "Geschichte, Theorie, Ethik der Medizin", abbreviation: GTE) forms part of the obligatory curriculum for medical students in Germany since the winter semester 2003/2004. This paper presents the results of a national survey on the contents, methods and framework of GTE teaching. Methods: Semi-structured questionnaire dispatched in July 2014 to 38 institutions responsible for GTE teaching. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data and content analysis of free-text answers. Results: It was possible to collect data from 29 institutes responsible for GTE teaching (response: 76%). There is at least one professorial chair for GTE in 19 faculties; two professorial chairs or professorships remained vacant at the time of the survey. The number of students taught per academic year ranges from <100 to >350. Teaching in GTE comprises an average of 2.18 hours per week per semester (min: 1, max: 6). Teaching in GTE is proportionally distributed according to an arithmetic average as follows: history: 35.4%, theory 14.7% and ethics 49.9%. Written learning objectives were formulated for GTE in 24 faculties. The preferred themes of teaching in history, theory or ethics which according to respondents should be taught comprise a broad spectrum and vary. Teaching in ethics (79 from a max. of 81 possible points) is, when compared to history (61/81) and theory (53/81), attributed the most significance for the training of medical doctors. Conclusion: 10 years after the introduction of GTE the number of students and the personnel resources available at the institutions vary considerably. In light of the differences regarding the content elicited in this study the pros and cons of heterogeneity in GTE should be discussed.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)Doc23
JournalGMS Journal for Medical Education
Volume34
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC5450424
Scopus 85019635252
ORCID /0000-0001-6269-5061/work/142247701

Keywords

Keywords

  • Curriculum, Education, Medical/history, Ethics, Medical/education, Faculty, Medical/history, Germany, History, 21st Century, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires