Evidenz versus Wirksamkeit am Beispiel von in Deutschland verkehrsfähigen Präparaten zur (allergen-)spezifischen Immuntherapie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • R. Brehler - , University of Münster (Author)
  • L. Klimek - , Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden (Author)
  • C. Vogelberg - , Department of Paediatrics, TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • T. Werfel - , Hannover Medical School (MHH) (Author)
  • O. Pfaar - , Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden (Author)
  • E. Hamelmann - , Ruhr University Bochum (Author)

Abstract

The present German guideline on allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) gives an excellent overview about published clinical trials proving the efficiency of allergen preparations for AIT. From the guideline derived publications are currently used for a debate initiated by the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians about conditions for the eligibility of reimbursement. We strongly oppose this discussion about restrictions for the refund ability of marketable AIT products only based on data about evidence evaluations. It is for the Paul-Ehrlich- Institute to decide on the marketability of drugs inclusively allergen extracts on the base of safety, efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. Here we focus on evidence, efficacy, marketability and refund ability of AIT preparations.

Translated title of the contribution
Evaluation of evidence versus efficiency of marketable allergen extracts for allergen specific immunotherapy

Details

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)29-35
Number of pages7
JournalAllergologie
Volume39
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • Allergen specific immunotherapy, Efficacy, Evidence, Guideline