Evaluation von neuen Versorgungsformen für Menschen mit psychischen Erkrankungen: Pro & Contra zum Einsatz von GKV-Routinedaten – Ein Erfahrungsbericht
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
The present article describes the special features of an evaluation of research in mental health services in Germany. The experiences of the evaluation of flexible and integrated treatment options with a global treatment budget in psychiatric hospitals based on routine data of more than 70 statutory health insurance (SHI) funds (EVA64 study) are systematically presented. Using the EVA64 study as an example, recommendations for the use of claims data in the field of mental health services research and in general are derived. (1) First, the study and its use of claims data is described and classified. (2) The individual outcomes of the study are presented and evaluated in order to (3) derive criteria, identify strengths and suggest potential uses of claims data. (4) Finally, recommendations for the further development of claims data from SHI funds as a basis for evaluation are described.
| Translated title of the contribution | An Experience Report on the Evaluation of New Forms of Care for People with Mental Illness Pros and Cons of the Use of SHI Claims Data |
|---|
Details
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | S212-S223 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Das Gesundheitswesen : Sozialmedizin, Gesundheits-System-Forschung, medizinischer Dienst, public health, öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst, Versorgungsforschung |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | S 03 |
| Early online date | 2 Apr 2024 |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2024 |
| Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
| Scopus | 85189870607 |
|---|
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Keywords
- evaluation, global treatment budget, mental health services research, Claims data from SHI funds, inpatient and outpatient treatment, flexible and integrated treatment