Evaluation von neuen Versorgungsformen für Menschen mit psychischen Erkrankungen: Pro & Contra zum Einsatz von GKV-Routinedaten – Ein Erfahrungsbericht

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

The present article describes the special features of an evaluation of research in mental health services in Germany. The experiences of the evaluation of flexible and integrated treatment options with a global treatment budget in psychiatric hospitals based on routine data of more than 70 statutory health insurance (SHI) funds (EVA64 study) are systematically presented. Using the EVA64 study as an example, recommendations for the use of claims data in the field of mental health services research and in general are derived. (1) First, the study and its use of claims data is described and classified. (2) The individual outcomes of the study are presented and evaluated in order to (3) derive criteria, identify strengths and suggest potential uses of claims data. (4) Finally, recommendations for the further development of claims data from SHI funds as a basis for evaluation are described.

Translated title of the contribution
An Experience Report on the Evaluation of New Forms of Care for People with Mental Illness
Pros and Cons of the Use of SHI Claims Data

Details

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)S212-S223
Number of pages12
Journal Das Gesundheitswesen : Sozialmedizin, Gesundheits-System-Forschung, medizinischer Dienst, public health, öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst, Versorgungsforschung
Volume86
Issue numberS 03
Early online date2 Apr 2024
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85189870607

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • evaluation, global treatment budget, mental health services research, Claims data from SHI funds, inpatient and outpatient treatment, flexible and integrated treatment