European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • David Cibula - , Charles University Prague (Author)
  • François Planchamp - , Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Author)
  • Daniela Fischerova - , Charles University Prague (Author)
  • Christina Fotopoulou - , Imperial College London (Author)
  • Christhardt Kohler - , University of Cologne (Author)
  • Fabio Landoni - , University of Milan - Bicocca (Author)
  • Patrice Mathevet - , University of Lausanne (Author)
  • Raj Naik - , Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust (Author)
  • Jordi Ponce - , University Hospital of Bellvitge (Author)
  • Francesco Raspagliesi - , IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano (Author)
  • Alexandros Rodolakis - , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Author)
  • Karl Tamussino - , Medical University of Graz (Author)
  • Cagatay Taskiran - , Gazi University (Author)
  • Ignace Vergote - , KU Leuven (Author)
  • Pauline Wimberger - , Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Author)
  • Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson - , University of Oslo (Author)
  • Denis Querleu - , Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Author)

Abstract

Background Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer. To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. Methods Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives. Results Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes. Discussion Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalInternational journal of gynecological cancer
Volume30
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 31900285

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • cervical cancer, surgical oncology, uterine cervical neoplasms