European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • David Cibula - , Karlsuniversität Prag (Autor:in)
  • François Planchamp - , Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Autor:in)
  • Daniela Fischerova - , Karlsuniversität Prag (Autor:in)
  • Christina Fotopoulou - , Imperial College London (Autor:in)
  • Christhardt Kohler - , Universität zu Köln (Autor:in)
  • Fabio Landoni - , Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca (Autor:in)
  • Patrice Mathevet - , Université de Lausanne (Autor:in)
  • Raj Naik - , Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust (Autor:in)
  • Jordi Ponce - , University Hospital of Bellvitge (Autor:in)
  • Francesco Raspagliesi - , IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano (Autor:in)
  • Alexandros Rodolakis - , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Autor:in)
  • Karl Tamussino - , Medizinische Universität Graz (Autor:in)
  • Cagatay Taskiran - , Gazi University (Autor:in)
  • Ignace Vergote - , KU Leuven (Autor:in)
  • Pauline Wimberger - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe (Autor:in)
  • Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson - , University of Oslo (Autor:in)
  • Denis Querleu - , Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer. To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. Methods Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives. Results Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes. Discussion Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)3-14
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftInternational journal of gynecological cancer
Jahrgang30
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Jan. 2020
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 31900285

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • cervical cancer, surgical oncology, uterine cervical neoplasms