Do we need to label large datasets for river water segmentation? Benchmark and stage estimation with minimum to non-labeled image time series

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

Automatic water segmentation often relies on supervised deep learning, which requires large, annotated datasets. We investigate deep learning approaches for water segmentation and, consequently, water stage estimation that need minimal or non-annotated datasets. We evaluated the Space-Time Correspondence Network or STCN, Segment Anything (SAM), and a combination of SAM with Grounding DINO. We used images from three stationary camera gauges and one dynamic river image dataset captured with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Further, we retrieved the water level using the produced water marks for the static images. For the UAV dataset, our results show that STCN and SAM achieved similar performances for image segmentation. Our findings reveal that the models can produce realistic water masks and water stage measurements. STCN achieved the best results for the camera gauges, making it a suitable option for sub-hour monitoring. Our approaches can be viable tools for ad hoc water stage measurements.

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational journal of remote sensing
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Feb 2025
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • camera gauge, Deep learning, remote sensing, water level, water segmentation