Current status and developments of German curriculum-based residency training programmes in radiation oncology

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Marcel Büttner - , University Hospital Münster (Author)
  • Nils Cordes - , OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology (Author)
  • Tobias Gauer - , University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf (Author)
  • Daniel Habermehl - , Radprax MVZ (Author)
  • Gunther Klautke - , Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH (Author)
  • Oliver Micke - , Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld (Author)
  • Matthias Mäurer - , Jena University Hospital (Author)
  • Jan Sokoll - , PRO RadioOncology GmbH (Author)
  • Esther Gera Cornelia Troost - , OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, University Medicine (Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital), School of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology (Author)
  • Hans Christiansen - , Hannover Medical School (MHH) (Author)
  • Maximilian Niyazi - , University Hospital Münster (Author)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current status of German residency training in the field of radiation oncology is provided and compared to programmes in other countries. In particular, we present the DEGRO-Academy within the international context.

METHODS: Certified courses from 2018 and 2019 were systematically assigned to the DEGRO-Curriculum, retrospectively for 2018 and prospectively for 2019. In addition, questionnaires of course evaluations were provided, answered by course participants and collected centrally.

RESULTS: Our data reveal a clear increase in curriculum coverage by certified courses from 57.6% in 2018 to 77.5% in 2019. The analyses enable potential improvements in German curriculum-based education. Specific topics of the DEGRO-Curriculum are still underrepresented, while others decreased in representation between 2018 and 2019. It was found that several topics in the DEGRO-Curriculum require more attention because of a low DEGRO-curriculum coverage. Evaluation results of certified courses improved significantly with a median grade of 1.62 in 2018 to 1.47 in 2019 (p = 0.0319).

CONCLUSION: The increase of curriculum coverage and the simultaneous improvement of course evaluations are promising with respect to educational standards in Germany. Additionally, the early integration of radiation oncology into medical education is a prerequisite for resident training because of rising demands on quality control and increasing patient numbers. This intensified focus is a requirement for continued high standards and quality of curriculum-based education in radiation oncology both in Germany and other countries.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number55
Pages (from-to)55
JournalRadiation Oncology
Volume16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2021
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC7981823
Scopus 85103165960
ORCID /0000-0001-5684-629X/work/146646175

Keywords

Keywords

  • Curriculum/statistics & numerical data, Germany, Humans, Internship and Residency, Program Evaluation, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Radiation Oncology/education, Surveys and Questionnaires