Current status and developments of German curriculum-based residency training programmes in radiation oncology

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Marcel Büttner - , Universitätsklinikum Münster (Autor:in)
  • Nils Cordes - , OncoRay - Nationales Zentrum für Strahlenforschung in der Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Nationales Zentrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology (Autor:in)
  • Tobias Gauer - , Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Habermehl - , Radprax MVZ (Autor:in)
  • Gunther Klautke - , Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Oliver Micke - , Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld (Autor:in)
  • Matthias Mäurer - , Universitätsklinikum Jena (Autor:in)
  • Jan Sokoll - , PRO RadioOncology GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Esther Gera Cornelia Troost - , OncoRay - Nationales Zentrum für Strahlenforschung in der Onkologie, Hochschulmedizin (Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum), Bereich Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Nationales Zentrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology (Autor:in)
  • Hans Christiansen - , Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH) (Autor:in)
  • Maximilian Niyazi - , Universitätsklinikum Münster (Autor:in)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current status of German residency training in the field of radiation oncology is provided and compared to programmes in other countries. In particular, we present the DEGRO-Academy within the international context.

METHODS: Certified courses from 2018 and 2019 were systematically assigned to the DEGRO-Curriculum, retrospectively for 2018 and prospectively for 2019. In addition, questionnaires of course evaluations were provided, answered by course participants and collected centrally.

RESULTS: Our data reveal a clear increase in curriculum coverage by certified courses from 57.6% in 2018 to 77.5% in 2019. The analyses enable potential improvements in German curriculum-based education. Specific topics of the DEGRO-Curriculum are still underrepresented, while others decreased in representation between 2018 and 2019. It was found that several topics in the DEGRO-Curriculum require more attention because of a low DEGRO-curriculum coverage. Evaluation results of certified courses improved significantly with a median grade of 1.62 in 2018 to 1.47 in 2019 (p = 0.0319).

CONCLUSION: The increase of curriculum coverage and the simultaneous improvement of course evaluations are promising with respect to educational standards in Germany. Additionally, the early integration of radiation oncology into medical education is a prerequisite for resident training because of rising demands on quality control and increasing patient numbers. This intensified focus is a requirement for continued high standards and quality of curriculum-based education in radiation oncology both in Germany and other countries.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer55
Seiten (von - bis)55
FachzeitschriftRadiation Oncology
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 20 März 2021
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMedCentral PMC7981823
Scopus 85103165960
ORCID /0000-0001-5684-629X/work/146646175

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Curriculum/statistics & numerical data, Germany, Humans, Internship and Residency, Program Evaluation, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Radiation Oncology/education, Surveys and Questionnaires