A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Occupational Factors Related to Rotator Cuff Disorders

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstractContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

Background: Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived a dose-response relationship and the resulting doubling dose. Objective(s): The aim of this systematic review is to derive the dose-response relationship between physical workload and lesions of the shoulder rotator cuff. The results of this systematic review have been published by Seidler et al. (2020). Method(s): Using methods of a previous review (van der Molen et al. 2017), we added more recent studies. The dose-response relationship between physical occupational demands (hands at/above shoulder level, repetitive movements, forceful work, hand-arm vibrations) and specific shoulder diseases (ICD-10 M 75.1-5: rotator cuff syndrome, bicipital tendinitis, calcific tendinitis, impingement, and bursitis) was derived. Finding(s): No evidence for sex-specific differences of the dose-response relationship was found. If there were at least two studies with comparable exposures, a meta-analysis was carried out. The pooled analysis resulted in a 21% risk increase (95% CI 4-41%) per 1000 hours of work with hands above shoulder level, leading to a doubling dose of 3636 hours. A meta-analysis was not possible for other diseases due to the low number of studies and differing exposure measurements. The estimate of the doubling dose was based on Dalboge et al. (2014). Conclusion(s): This systematic review with meta-analysis contributes to knowledge of the exposure level at which specific shoulder diseases, e.g., rotator cuff lesions, should be recognized as an occupational disease.Copyright © 2021

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S29-S29
Number of pages1
Journal Safety and health at work : SHaW
Volume13
Issue numberSuppl
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0001-7668-4734/work/160479829
Mendeley c02c4b3b-e553-3e7c-b22a-94f66dbe4b92
unpaywall 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.801

Keywords