A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Occupational Factors Related to Rotator Cuff Disorders

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftMeeting AbstractBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

Abstract

Background: Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived a dose-response relationship and the resulting doubling dose. Objective(s): The aim of this systematic review is to derive the dose-response relationship between physical workload and lesions of the shoulder rotator cuff. The results of this systematic review have been published by Seidler et al. (2020). Method(s): Using methods of a previous review (van der Molen et al. 2017), we added more recent studies. The dose-response relationship between physical occupational demands (hands at/above shoulder level, repetitive movements, forceful work, hand-arm vibrations) and specific shoulder diseases (ICD-10 M 75.1-5: rotator cuff syndrome, bicipital tendinitis, calcific tendinitis, impingement, and bursitis) was derived. Finding(s): No evidence for sex-specific differences of the dose-response relationship was found. If there were at least two studies with comparable exposures, a meta-analysis was carried out. The pooled analysis resulted in a 21% risk increase (95% CI 4-41%) per 1000 hours of work with hands above shoulder level, leading to a doubling dose of 3636 hours. A meta-analysis was not possible for other diseases due to the low number of studies and differing exposure measurements. The estimate of the doubling dose was based on Dalboge et al. (2014). Conclusion(s): This systematic review with meta-analysis contributes to knowledge of the exposure level at which specific shoulder diseases, e.g., rotator cuff lesions, should be recognized as an occupational disease.Copyright © 2021

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)S29-S29
Seitenumfang1
Fachzeitschrift Safety and health at work : SHaW
Jahrgang13
AusgabenummerSuppl
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Jan. 2022
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0001-7668-4734/work/160479829
Mendeley c02c4b3b-e553-3e7c-b22a-94f66dbe4b92
unpaywall 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.801

Schlagworte