Zur wertigkeit der dilatationstracheotomie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Wolfgang Kehrl - , Klinik und Ambulatorium für HNO-Krankheiten (Author)
  • Ch Sagowski - , University of Hamburg (Author)
  • S. Wenzel - , University of Hamburg (Author)
  • Th Beleites - , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Author)
  • Ch Offergeld - , Klinik und Ambulatorium für HNO-Krankheiten (Author)

Abstract

After standardizing surgical procedures around 1900 Shelden, Toye, Weinstein and Ciaglia developed the percutaneous dilational tracheotomy (PDT). At present it is recognized that about 50% of the anestesiological Intensive care Units (ICU) in Germany are using the PDT while favorizing the Ciaglia-technique in the majority of cases. Further techniques are known as Griggs-, Fantoni-, Percu-Twist- and Blue-Rhino-method. Some of these are relatively new, therefore making critical comparison with other methods almost impossible due to lack of experience. The most feared complications of PDT are injury of the cricoid cartilage or of the rear tracheal wall as well as paratracheal positioning of a tracheotomy tube. Comparison between PDT and surgical techniques are difficult due to certain contraindications for PDT which are not valid for surgical procedures. Consecutively PDT will not be able to substitute surgical tracheotomy in the future. It furthermore can't be advocated as an alternative therapeutic option for mobile in-patients outside the ICU.

Translated title of the contribution
The valence of dilatational tracheotomy

Details

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)583-595
Number of pages13
JournalLaryngo- Rhino- Otologie
Volume82
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2003
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 12915993

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • Complication, Conventional tracheotomy, Dilatational tracheotomy, Indication