Zur Validität eines automatisierten inhaltsanalytischen Instrumentes der Angstmessung: Das Dresdner Angstwörterbuch

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

Content analysis has a long history in clinical psychological research. Recently, it regains attention because of rapid technological developments in the field of data processing. This article introduces the Dresden Anxiety Dictionary (DAW), a German computerised version of the Gottschalk-Gleser anxiety scales. In the present study the validity of this new method was assessed. Measures of trait and state anxiety were administered to 60 subjects and speech samples were obtained. The DAW presented a good validity showing high correlations with conventionally derived Gottschalk-Gleser scores. The DAW showed also substantial correlations with another content analytic method, the Affective Dictionary Ulm (ADU). We found evidence that content analytic anxiety measures differ in their measurement construct from self-descriptive questionnaires (BAI and STAI) which is consistent with previous research findings.

Translated title of the contribution
Validity of an automated content analytic instrument for anxiety measurement
The Dresden Anxiety Dictionary (DAW)

Details

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)88-105
Number of pages18
JournalZeitschrift für klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Volume49
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 0035077366
ORCID /0000-0002-1491-9195/work/142256017

Keywords

Keywords

  • Anxiety, Computerized Assessment, Content Analysis, Test Validity, test validity of Dresdner Angstwoerterbuch (DAW), German computerized version of Gottschalk-Gleser anxiety scales, ADU & BAI & STAI, 60 subjects