Wie schreibe ich eine gute Übersichtsarbeit?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
- University of Rostock
- Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
- University of Greifswald
Abstract
Clinical reviews are an important part of the medical literature offering the reader condensed information on a specific topic. In radiology and nuclear medicine most clinical reviews have a subjective character as they have been written in a rather narrative way. Based on their low level of evidence these narrative reviews are frequently not being considered for establishment of clinical guidelines. The aim of this paper is to aid the reader in writing a good clinical review by highlighting the different aspects of a systematic review.
Translated title of the contribution | How to write a good clinical review? |
---|
Details
Original language | German |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 69-74 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Nuklearmedizin |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 23 Dec 2014 |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMed | 25774019 |
---|
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- GRADE, Guideline, PICO, Systematic review