Why we should include soil structural dynamics of agricultural soils in hydrological models

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Parvathy Chandrasekhar - , Chair of Site Ecology and Plant Nutrition, United Nations University - Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES) (Author)
  • Janis Kreiselmeier - , Chair of Site Ecology and Plant Nutrition, United Nations University - Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES) (Author)
  • Andreas Schwen - , University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (Author)
  • Thomas Weninger - , University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (Author)
  • Stefan Julich - , Chair of Site Ecology and Plant Nutrition (Author)
  • Karl Heinz Feger - , Chair of Site Ecology and Plant Nutrition (Author)
  • Kai Schwärzel - , United Nations University - Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES) (Author)

Abstract

Surface soil structure is sensitive to natural and anthropogenic impacts that alter soil hydraulic properties (SHP). These alterations have distinct consequences on the water cycle. In this review, we summarized published findings on the quantitative effects of different agricultural management practices on SHP and the subsequent response of the water balance components. Generally, immediately after tillage, soils show a high abundance of large pores, which are temporally unstable and collapse due to environmental factors like rainfall. Nevertheless, most hydrological modeling studies consider SHP as temporally constant when predicting the flow of water and solutes in the atmosphere-plant-soil system. There have been some developments in mathematical approaches to capture the temporal dynamics of soil pore space. We applied one such pore evolution model to two datasets to evaluate its suitability to predict soil pore space dynamics after disturbance. Lack of knowledge on how dispersion of pore size distribution behaves after tillage may have led to over-estimation of some values predicted by the model. Nevertheless, we found that the model predicted the evolution of soil pore space reasonably well (r 2 > 0.80 in most cases). The limiting factor to efficiently calibrate and apply such modeling tools is not in the theoretical part but rather the lack of adequate soil structural and hydrologic data.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number1862
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2018
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0001-8948-1901/work/168717631

Keywords

Keywords

  • Pore size distribution, Soil hydraulic properties, Soil structure, Temporal dynamics, Tillage effects