What can we learn from failed clinical trials in multiple sclerosis?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
The list of failed trials with ineffective or toxic drugs, despite encouraging data from research, is growing. Therapeutic trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) may be particularly vulnerable to fail because the pathogenesis of this disease is still not understood. Thus theoretically promising agents may paradoxically increase disease activity or be associated with unforeseen adverse effects. Short-term favourable trends may reverse with a prolonged follow-up. Antigen-specific therapies can stimulate in vivo rather than to inhibit encephalitogenic cells. In addition to the negative message of failed trials itself, they can promote new hypotheses about disease pathophysiology. Failed trials can provide valuable information how studies and outcome measures should be designed for future trials. So it is important that negative trials are published and available for the MS community.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 97-101 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of neurology |
Volume | 255 |
Issue number | Suppl 6 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2008 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMed | 19300968 |
---|---|
ORCID | /0000-0001-8799-8202/work/171553444 |
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, Failed clinical trials, Multiple sclerosis, Safety