Well done (for someone of your gender)! Experimental evidence of teachers’ stereotype-based shifting standards for test grading and elaborated feedback
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
In three experiments (Ns = 327/137/210), we investigated whether test grades and elaborated feedback in a stereotypically male (Math) and a stereotypically female subject (German) are biased by the student’s gender. For this purpose, pre-service teachers graded and provided written feedback on tests which were allegedly from boys or girls. In addition, participants’ belief in stereotypes was measured in Study 1 and 2 and manipulated in Study 3 to test its moderating role. A meta-analysis across the three studies confirmed the following pattern: a small to moderate stereotype-contrasting grading bias, if the evaluators endorsed stereotypes, but no bias if they did not. Tests from the gender that, according to the stereotype, is weaker in the domain, were graded better. Study 1 and 3 further showed that the supposedly weaker gender received more elaborated feedback. The results are discussed in terms of shifting standards and previous findings in gender bias in school.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 809-834 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Social psychology of education : an international journal |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
ORCID | /0000-0002-4280-6534/work/142251678 |
---|
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- Feedback, Gender bias, Gender stereotypes, Grades, Marks, Performance evaluation, Shifting standards, Stereotype endorsement, Teacher