Ultrasound education in the digital era: face-to-face vs. webinar-teaching of head and neck ultrasound theory—a prospective multi-center study

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Johannes Matthias Weimer - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Maximilian Rink - , University of Regensburg (Author)
  • Marie Brandt - , University of Regensburg (Author)
  • Luisa Symeou - , University of Regensburg (Author)
  • Benjamin Philipp Ernst - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Christoph Sproll - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Alessandro Bozzato - , Saarland University (Author)
  • Lukas Pillong - , Saarland University (Author)
  • Johanna Helfrich - , Saarland University (Author)
  • Andreas Weimer - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • Marie Stäuber - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Holger Buggenhagen - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Roman Kloeckner - , University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck (Author)
  • Florian Recker - , University of Bonn (Author)
  • Thomas Beleites - , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Author)
  • Naglaa Mansour - , University Medical Center Freiburg (Author)
  • Julian Künzel - , University of Regensburg (Author)

Abstract

Introduction: Digitalization offers significant potential benefits to ultrasound education. This study compares the effectiveness of webinar teaching against face-to-face teaching in providing theoretical competencies in certified head and neck ultrasound (HNUS) courses. Patients and methods: This prospective, controlled, multicenter study was conducted in 2023 at three universities with certified HNUS courses. One course used webinar lessons (S), and the others used face-to-face teaching (C). The control group courses (C) were held on two consecutive days. The first day of the study group course was held as a webinar (S) 1 week before the second day and was also recorded for preparatory purposes. All participants completed three assessments: a pre-course self-evaluation (Evaluationpre), a post-course self-evaluation (Evaluationpost), and a post-course theory test (Theory Testpost). The evaluations used a Likert scale (1–7) to record the participants’ subjective assessments of competencies and attitudes toward webinar teaching. Theory Testpost included multiple-choice and free-answer questions on the sonographic pathologies of lymph nodes, the soft tissue of the neck, and salivary glands. A group of inexperienced medical students (V) completed the Theory Testpost for validation purposes. Result: 128 data sets were analyzed (31 S; 30 C; 47 V). Both groups, S and C, rated their competencies after the courses significantly higher than before (p < 0.01) but at a similar level in comparison with each other (p = 0.34). Both groups supported teaching theoretical content through webinars (S: 6.7 ± 0.5 vs. C: 6.2 ± 0.9). Both groups achieved similar results in the Theory Testpost (p = 0.54), significantly outperforming the validation group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggest that webinars can be an effective alternative to face-to-face lessons in teaching theoretical competencies in HNUS. Participants gave overall positive evaluations of digital teaching methods. Our findings support evidence that digital learning methods are valuable for modern ultrasound education.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number1506260
Number of pages13
JournalFrontiers in medicine
Volume12
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2025
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • blended learning, certified ultrasound education, digital transformation, digitalization, face-to-face-teaching, head and neck ultrasound, webinar-teaching