Triptan non-response in specialized headache care: cross-sectional data from the DMKG Headache Registry

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Ruth Ruscheweyh - , Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich (Author)
  • Gudrun Gossrau - , Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Comprehensive Pain Centre (Author)
  • Thomas Dresler - , University Hospital Tübingen (Author)
  • Tobias Freilinger - , Hospital Passau (Author)
  • Stefanie Förderreuther - , Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich (Author)
  • Charly Gaul - , Headache Center Frankfurt (Author)
  • Torsten Kraya - , Hospital Sankt Georg Leipzig gGmbH (Author)
  • Lars Neeb - , Helios Hospital Group (Author)
  • Victoria Ruschil - , University of Tübingen (Author)
  • Andreas Straube - , Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich (Author)
  • Jörg Scheidt - , Hof University of Applied Sciences (Author)
  • Tim Patrick Jürgens - , Rostock University Medical Centre (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Triptans are effective for many migraine patients, but some do not experience adequate efficacy and tolerability. The European Headache Federation (EHF) has proposed that patients with lack of efficacy and/or tolerability of ≥ 2 triptans ('triptan resistance') could be considered eligible for treatment with the novel medications from the ditan and gepant groups. There is little data on the frequency of 'triptan resistance'.

METHODS: We used patient self-report data from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG) Headache Registry to assess triptan response and triptan efficacy and/or tolerability failure.

RESULTS: A total of 2284 adult migraine patients (females: 85.4%, age: 39.4 ± 12.8 years) were included. 42.5% (n = 970) had failed ≥ 1 triptan, 13.1% (n = 300) had failed ≥ 2 triptans (meeting the EHF definition of 'triptan resistance'), and 3.9% (n = 88) had failed ≥ 3 triptans. Compared to triptan responders (current use, no failure, n = 597), triptan non-responders had significantly more severe migraine (higher frequency (p < 0.001), intensity (p < 0.05), and disability (p < 0.001)), that further increased with the level of triptan failure. Responders rates were highest for nasal and oral zolmitriptan, oral eletriptan and subcutaneous sumatriptan.

CONCLUSION: In the present setting (specialized headache care in Germany), 13.1% of the patients had failed ≥ 2 triptans. Triptan failure was associated with increased migraine severity and disability, emphasizing the importance of establishing an effective and tolerable acute migraine medication. Acute treatment optimization might include switching to one of the triptans with the highest responder rates and/or to a different acute medication class.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DMKG Headache Registry is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00021081).

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number135
JournalThe Journal of headache and pain
Volume24
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 10 Oct 2023
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC10563311
Scopus 85173613203

Keywords

Keywords

  • Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Headache/drug therapy, Migraine Disorders/drug therapy, Tryptamines/therapeutic use, Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use