Treatment in certified cancer centers is related to better survival in patients with colon and rectal cancer: evidence from a large German cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Veronika Bierbaum - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (First author)
  • Christoph Bobeth - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Martin Roessler - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Michael Gerken - , Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e.V. (ADT) (Author)
  • Kees Kleihues-van Tol - , Tumorzentrum Regensburg (Author)
  • Christoph Reissfelder - , Universitätsmedizin Mannheim (Author)
  • Alois Fürst - , Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef Regensburg (Author)
  • Christian Günster - , Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse (AOK), Research Institute Berlin (Author)
  • Patrik Dröge - , Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse (AOK), Research Institute Berlin (Author)
  • Thomas Ruhnke - , Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse (AOK), Research Institute Berlin (Author)
  • Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke - , Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e.V. (ADT) (Author)
  • Jochen Schmitt - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Olaf Schoffer - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Last author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certified cancer centers aim to ensure high-quality care by establishing structural and procedural standards according to evidence-based guidelines. Despite the high clinical and health policy relevance, evidence from a nation-wide study for the effectiveness of care for colorectal cancer in certified centers vs. other hospitals in Germany is still missing.

METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study covering the years 2009-2017, we analyzed patient data using demographic information, diagnoses, and treatments from a nationwide statutory health insurance enriched with information on certification. We investigated whether patients with incident colon or rectal cancer did benefit from primary therapy in a certified cancer center. We used relative survival analysis taking into account mortality data of the German population and adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics via Cox regression with shared frailty for patients in hospitals with and without certification.

RESULTS: The cohorts for colon and rectal cancer consisted of 109,518 and 51,417 patients, respectively, treated in a total of 1052 hospitals. 37.2% of patients with colon and 42.9% of patients with rectal cancer were treated in a certified center. Patient age, sex, comorbidities, secondary malignoma, and distant metastases were similar across groups (certified/non-certified) for both colon and rectal cancer. Relative survival analysis showed significantly better survival of patients treated in a certified center, with 68.3% (non-certified hospitals 65.8%) 5-year survival for treatment of colon cancer in certified (p < 0.001) and 65.0% (58.8%) 5-year survival in case of rectal cancer (p < 0.001), respectively. Cox regression with adjustment for relevant covariates yielded a lower hazard of death for patients treated in certified centers for both colon (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89-0.95) and rectal cancer (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88-0.95). The results remained robust in a series of sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study yields new important evidence that patients with colorectal cancer have a better chance of survival if treated in a certified cancer center. Certification thus provides one powerful means to improve the quality of care for colorectal cancer. To decrease the burden of disease, more patients should thus receive cancer care in a certified center.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
JournalWorld journal of surgical oncology
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC10770882
Scopus 85181501633

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Humans, Cohort Studies, Retrospective Studies, Rectal Neoplasms/therapy, Certification, Colon