Transvenous lead extraction in patients with systemic cardiac device-related infection-Procedural outcome and risk prediction: A GALLERY subgroup analysis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
- Department of Cardiac Surgery (at Dresden Heart Centre)
- Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
- Kerckhoff Clinic
- Bethesda Johanniter Hospital Duisburg-Rheinhausen
- Marien-Hospital Siegen
- Immanuel Albertinen Diakonie
- University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung (DZHK)
- Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has evolved as one of the most crucial treatment options for patients with cardiac device-related systemic infection (CDRSI).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the procedural outcome and risk factors of patients with CDRSI undergoing TLE.
METHODS: A subgroup analysis of patients with CDRSI of the GALLERY (GermAn Laser Lead Extraction RegistrY) database was performed. Predictors for complications, procedural failure, and all-cause mortality were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 722 patients (28.6%) in the GALLERY had "systemic infection" as extraction indication. Patients with CDRSI were older (70.1 ± 12.2 years vs 67.3 ± 14.3 years; P < .001) and had more comorbidities than patients with local infections or noninfectious extraction indications. There were no differences in complete procedural success (90.6% vs 91.7%; P = .328) or major complications (2.5% vs 1.9%; P = .416) but increased procedure-related (1.4% vs 0.3%; P = .003) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 0.6%; P < .001) for patients with CDRSI. Multivariate analyses revealed lead age ≥10 years as a predictor for procedural complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-6.60; P = .001). Lead age ≥10 years (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.03-6.46; P = .04) was also a predictor for procedural failure. We identified left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.00-2.99; P = .049), age ≥75 years (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.27-3.48; P = .004), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.17-3.14; P = .01), and overall procedural complications (OR 5.15; 95% CI 2.44-10.84; P < .001) as predictors for all-cause mortality.
CONCLUSION: Patients with CDRSI undergoing TLE demonstrate an increased rate of all-cause in-hospital, as well as procedure-related mortality, despite having comparable procedural success rates. Given these data, it seems paramount to develop preventive strategies to detect and treat CDRSI in its earliest stages.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 181-189 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Heart rhythm |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2023 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
Scopus | 85143165501 |
---|
Keywords
Keywords
- Humans, Child, Aged, Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left, Heart Diseases/etiology, Comorbidity, Device Removal/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects, Retrospective Studies