Transgluteal MRI in-bore prostate biopsy in routine clinical practice: a contemporary-cohort-study from a german tertiary center

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Thomas Vogl - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Maximilian Holzer - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Scherwin Mahmoudi - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Leon Grünewald - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Vitali Koch - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Jennifer Gotta - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Philipp Reschke - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Mike Wenzel - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Benedikt Hoeh - , Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Philipp Mandel - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Felix Chun - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Jens Köllermann - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Boris Bodelle - , University Hospital Frankfurt, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen gGmbH (Author)
  • Simon Martin - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Jan Erik Scholtz - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Renate Hammerstingl - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Tatjana Gruber-Rouh - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Katrin Eichler - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Peter Wild - , University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt a.M. (Author)
  • Simon Bernatz - , University Hospital Frankfurt (Author)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance, predictors, and clinical utility of MRI-guided prostate biopsy over an 18 year period in a real-world tertiary care setting. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate biopsy between 2006 and 2024 at a German tertiary care center. Clinical data, PI-RADS, PSA levels, prostate volume, and biopsy outcomes were evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between clinical variables and cancer detection, clinical significance (ISUP ≥ 3), and upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RPE). Results: Among 496 patients (mean age 66 ± 8 years; PSA, median (IQR): 7.2 ng/ml (5–10)), cancer was detected in 33% (162/496), with 29% (47/162) classified as clinically significant. In our biopsy cohort (PI-RADS 3: 12.7%, PI-RADS 4: 43.0%, PI-RADS 5: 5.6%), clinically significant prostate cancer (ISUP ≥ 3) was detected in 3.2% of PI-RADS 3, 12.2% of PI-RADS 4, and 28.6% of PI-RADS 5 lesions. PI-RADS 5 lesions were strongly associated with cancer detection (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.35–10.13) and significant disease (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.38–55.15), independent of age, prostate volume, and biopsy extent. While these covariates predicted overall biopsy positivity (p < 0.02), they were not associated with significant cancer (p > 0.05) or upgrading at RPE (p > 0.05). Among 29 RPE patients, only one was upgraded. Post-biopsy CT was performed in all patients: MRI-guided biopsy was associated with a low complication rate: minor localized bleeding occurred in 4.4% of cases, and no major adverse events were observed. Conclusions: MRI-guided prostate biopsy showed high diagnostic accuracy and safety in routine care. PI-RADS was the key predictor of clinically significant cancer. The low rate of upgrading after RPE supports its reliability in guiding patient management and avoiding overtreatment. Clinical relevance statement: MRI-guided prostate biopsy enables accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with low risk of understaging, supporting its routine use in personalized urologic oncology.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalInternational urology and nephrology
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Jan 2026
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • Diagnostic accuracy, Image-guided biopsy, Magnetic resonance imaging, PI-RADS, Prostate cancer