Towards systematic and evidence-based conservation planning for western chimpanzees

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Stefanie Heinicke - , Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle—Jena—Leipzig (Author)
  • Roger Mundry - , Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (Author)
  • Christophe Boesch - , Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF) (Author)
  • Kimberley J. Hockings - , University of Exeter (Author)
  • Rebecca Kormos - , University of California at Berkeley (Author)
  • Papa Ibnou Ndiaye - , Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar (Author)
  • Clement G. Tweh - , Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF), University of Nairobi (Author)
  • Elizabeth A. Williamson - , University of Stirling (Author)
  • Hjalmar S. Kühl - , Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle—Jena—Leipzig (Author)

Abstract

As animal populations continue to decline, frequently driven by large-scale land-use change, there is a critical need for improved environmental planning. While data-driven spatial planning is widely applied in conservation, as of yet it is rarely used for primates. The western chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) declined by 80% within 24 years and was uplisted to Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2016. To support conservation planning for western chimpanzees, we systematically identified geographic areas important for this taxon. We based our analysis on a previously published data set of modeled density distribution and on several scenarios that accounted for different spatial scales and conservation targets. Across all scenarios, typically less than one-third of areas we identified as important are currently designated as high-level protected areas (i.e., national park or IUCN category I or II). For example, in the scenario for protecting 50% of all chimpanzees remaining in West Africa (i.e., approximately 26,500 chimpanzees), an area of approximately 60,000 km2 was selected (i.e., approximately 12% of the geographic range), only 24% of which is currently designated as protected areas. The derived maps can be used to inform the geographic prioritization of conservation interventions, including protected area expansion, “no-go-zones” for industry and infrastructure, and conservation sites outside the protected area network. Environmental guidelines by major institutions funding infrastructure and resource extraction projects explicitly require corporations to minimize the negative impact on great apes. Therefore, our results can inform avoidance and mitigation measures during the planning phases of such projects. This study was designed to inform future stakeholder consultation processes that could ultimately integrate the conservation of western chimpanzees with national land-use priorities. Our approach may help in promoting similar work for other primate taxa to inform systematic conservation planning in times of growing threats.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere23042
JournalAmerican journal of primatology
Volume81
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2019
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

PubMed 31468565

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Pan troglodytes verus, spatial planning, spatial prioritization, systematic conservation planning, West Africa, western chimpanzee