The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Franz Sebastian Schwindling - , University Hospital Heidelberg (Author)
  • Michael Raedel - , Department of Prosthetic Dentistry (Author)
  • Nicole Passia - , Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Kiel University (Author)
  • Sandra Freitag-Wolf - , Kiel University (Author)
  • Stefan Wolfart - , University Hospital Aachen (Author)
  • Wael Att - , University of Freiburg (Author)
  • Torsten Mundt - , Greifswald University Hospital (Author)
  • Daniel Reissmann - , University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf (Author)
  • Fadi Ismail - , Leibniz University Hannover (LUH) (Author)
  • Valerie von Königsmark - , Ulm University Medical Center (Author)
  • Matthias Kern - , Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Kiel University (Author)

Abstract

PURPOSE: A single implant can be placed to retain an overdenture in the edentulous mandible. This study aimed at the development of Oral Health-related Quality of Life comparing immediate and delayed implant loading, i.e., loading after 3 months of submerged healing.

METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 158 participants received a single mandibular implant in the midline. Quality of life was measured using the summary score of the German 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile at baseline, one month after implant placement (direct loading group) as well as one and four months after loading.

RESULTS: Mean scores at baseline were comparable. Four months after implantation, a decrease of mean scores was recognized for both groups, indicating a significantly enhanced quality of life after treatment. When comparing the groups after both 1 and 4 months of loading, quality of life was insignificantly higher in the delayed loading group (1 month: 42.1 vs. 32.3; 4 months: 33.6 vs. 27.7). For immediate loading, an insignificant tendency to an earlier improvement was recognized (Δ1month-baseline: 9.7, compared to Δ1month-baseline: 6.4).

CONCLUSIONS: The single mandibular implant concept was associated with a positive impact on quality of life. However, no statistically significant influence of implant loading on quality of life was found.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-316
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of prosthodontic research
Volume62
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85041576375
ORCID /0000-0002-3548-9462/work/142247468

Keywords

Keywords

  • Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/methods, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Immediate Dental Implant Loading/methods, Jaw, Edentulous, Male, Mandible, Middle Aged, Oral Health, Quality of Life, Time Factors