The sequencing of academic freedom violations during democratic erosion: Comparing the cases of Hungary and Poland
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
This paper addresses the widely accepted but still little elaborated observation that democratic erosion evolves in a sequential manner. We argue that the violation of academic freedom takes place after the incumbent erosion agents changed the democratic rules and secured grip on power. The analysis bases on a focused comparison of two cases of democratic erosion in the European Union – Hungary (2010–) and Poland (2015–2023) – tracing the evolution of measures curtailing academic freedom. The findings confirm that the attack against academic freedom is implemented with a time lag. Although the illiberal governments in Hungary and Poland sought from the outset to increase their influence on academia and to shape the public debate, tangible restrictions occurred only after political institutions had been reshaped in a way that would ensure their stay in power. Moreover, our longitudinal perspective reveals that, over time, measures are not only increasing in number, but also in scope and severity.
Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International political science review : IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP / International Political Science Association |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 7 Jan 2026 |
| Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
| ORCID | /0000-0001-9879-5953/work/224211276 |
|---|---|
| Scopus | 105026680906 |
Keywords
Keywords
- academic freedom, Hungary, public sphere, human rights, Poland, Democratic erosion