The evidence-practice gap in specialist mental healthcare: Systematic review and meta-analysis of guideline implementation studies

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Francesca Girlanda - , Ulm University, University of Verona (Author)
  • Ines Fiedler - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Thomas Becker - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Corrado Barbui - , University of Verona (Author)
  • Markus Koesters - , Ulm University (Author)

Abstract

Background Clinical practice guidelines are not easily implemented, leading to a gap between research synthesis and their use in routine care. Aims To summarise the evidence relating to the impact of guideline implementation on provider performance and patient outcomes in mental healthcare settings, and to explore the performance of different strategies for guideline implementation. Method A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and before-and-after studies comparing guideline implementation strategies v. usual care, and different guideline implementation strategies, in patients with severe mental illness. Results In total, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies did not show a consistent positive effect of guideline implementation on provider performance, but a more consistent small to modest positive effect on patient outcomes. Conclusions Guideline implementation does not seem to have an impact on provider performance, nonetheless it may influence patient outcomes positively.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalBritish journal of psychiatry
Volume210
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

PubMed 27445353
ORCID /0000-0001-7018-6021/work/168207915

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

ASJC Scopus subject areas