The Clinical Complexity of Penile Cancer: Current Clinical-Epidemiological Data from the Database of the Free State of Saxony/Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Wolf-Diether U Boehm - , TUD Dresden University of Technology (First author)
  • Daniela Piontek - , Joint Cancer Registry (Author)
  • Stefanie Latarius - , Department of Urology (Author)
  • Olaf Schoffer - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Angelika Borkowetz - , Department of Urology (Author)
  • Stefanie J Klug - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Manfred P Wirth - , Department of Urology (Last author)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess penile cancer incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment options, transparency of clinical quality, and relative survival based on data from the clinical cancer registry.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 898 patients with tumours of the penis were diagnosed and analysed in the period from 2000 to 2018; they were documented in the 4 regional clinical cancer registries and summarized in the Command Office of these 4 registries.

RESULTS: The standardized incidence rate increased from 0.86 in 2000 to 2.67 in 2018. Most tumours were located at the glans (42.9%) followed by the prepuce (19.5%) and corpus penis (6.9%); they were classified into pT1a/pT1b (20.0%/7.0%), pT2 (23.5%), pT3 (12.4%), and pT4 (0.8%). In only 32.0% of all documented cases, a stage-related lymphadenectomy (LND) was carried out. Negative surgical margins were found in only 70% and the Rx status in 15.1%. Primary metastasis was detected in pN1 (5.1%), pN2 (3.9%), pN3 (3.1%), and M1 status in 3.0%, respectively. The predominant therapy was surgery in 78.3%. The proportion of penile partial resections was significantly (p = 0.0045) regredient over the control period. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 4.7%, adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy in 3.0%. The 5-year relative overall survival rate was 74.7% and ranged from 108.0% (stage 0) to 17.1% (stage IV). A total of 29 hospitals performed tumour operations.

CONCLUSIONS: The multitude of clinical and epidemiological variables available in clinical cancer registries allows a safe assessment of tumour dynamics themselves, as well as good quality of transparency and broadly acceptable guideline adherence. Deviations from the accepted level of evidence were found in the grading definition, in the high quota of positive surgical margins, in the defensive indication position to the glans resurfacing/reconstruction and diagnostical LND. Based on these relevant findings in the database combined with the low frequency of the tumour in area/clinics/year, we recommended establishing SCCP reference clinics. This work is the first time that European standardized rate-based cancer registry data on penile cancer from Germany has been communicated.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706-715
Number of pages10
JournalUrologia internationalis
Volume106
Issue number7
Early online date26 Oct 2021
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC9393839
Scopus 85118396812
ORCID /0000-0001-6922-7148/work/168207717

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Germany/epidemiology, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Male, Penile Neoplasms/epidemiology, Penis/pathology, Survival Rate

Library keywords