Sex-specific inequalities in the use of drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease: a report from the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Maria Rubini Gimenez - , University of Basel (Author)
  • Bruno Scheller - , Saarland University (Author)
  • Ahmed Farah - , Bad Berka Central Clinic (Author)
  • Marc-Alexander Ohlow - , Bad Berka Central Clinic (Author)
  • Norman Mangner - , Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology (at Dresden Heart Centre), TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Daniel Weilenmann - , Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (Author)
  • Jochen Wöhrle - , Ulm University Medical Center (Author)
  • Florim Cuculi - , Cantonal Hospital Luzern (Author)
  • Gregor Leibundgut - , Cantonal Hospital Baselland (Author)
  • Sven Möbius-Winkler - , Friedrich Schiller University Jena (Author)
  • Marco Cattaneo - , University Hospital Basel (Author)
  • Nicole Gilgen - , University of Basel (Author)
  • Christoph Kaiser - , University of Basel (Author)
  • Raban V Jeger - , University of Basel (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent data have established non-inferiority of drug-coated balloons (DCB) compared to drug-eluting stents (DES) for treatment of small-vessel coronary artery disease. Since coronary vessels in women might have anatomical and pathophysiological particularities, the safety of the DCB strategy among women compared to men needs to be assessed in more detail.

METHODS: In BASKET-SMALL 2, patients with de novo lesions in coronary vessels < 3 mm and an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated (1:1) to DCB vs. DES after successful lesion preparation. The primary objective of the randomized trial was to establish non-inferiority of DCB vs. DES regarding major adverse cardiac events (MACE; i.e., cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) after 12 months. The aim of the current sub-analysis is to evaluate whether the DCB strategy is equally safe among women and men after 12 and 36 months.

RESULTS: Among 758 randomized patients, 382 were assigned to DCB (23% women) and 376 to DES (30% women). In general, women were older, had more often diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency, and presented more often with an acute coronary syndrome, whereas men were more often smokers, had multivessel disease and a previous history of acute myocardial infarction, and received a treatment with a statin. After 3 years, the primary clinical end point was not significantly different between groups (13% women vs. 16% men, HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.52-1.30; p = 0.40). There was no interaction between sex and coronary intervention strategy regarding MACE at 36 months (10% women vs. 16% men in DCB, 16% women vs. 15% men in DES; pinteraction = 0.31).

CONCLUSION: In small native coronary artery disease, there was no statistically significant effect of sex on the difference between DCB and DES regarding MACE up to 36 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov . Unique identifier: NCT01574534. CAD coronary artery disease, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, HR Hazard ratio, DCB drug-coated balloon, DES drug-eluting stent.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)959-966
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
Volume113
Issue number7
Early online date26 Jul 2023
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85165633421
Mendeley bb8b7fd0-a6c2-3ec3-9db7-df78f28a3a92

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals