Sex dependence of postoperative pulmonary complications – A post hoc unmatched and matched analysis of LAS VEGAS

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • the Protective Ventilation Network - (Author)
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC)
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • University of Sheffield
  • University of Bonn
  • Monash University
  • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
  • University of Insubria
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Columbia University
  • Hospital Bergmannstrost
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
  • Leipzig University
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU)
  • University of Oxford
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • LKH Medical University Clinic Graz
  • Kepler University Hospital
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • East Limburg Hospital
  • Ghent University
  • Maria Middelares

Abstract

Study objective: Male sex has inconsistently been associated with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). These studies were different in size, design, population and preoperative risk. We reanalysed the database of ‘Local ASsessment of Ventilatory management during General Anaesthesia for Surgery study’ (LAS VEGAS) to evaluate differences between females and males with respect to PPCs. Design, setting and patients: Post hoc unmatched and matched analysis of LAS VEGAS, an international observational study in patients undergoing intraoperative ventilation under general anaesthesia for surgery in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs in the first 5 postoperative days. Individual PPCs, hospital length of stay and mortality were secondary endpoints. Propensity score matching was used to create a similar cohort regarding type of surgery and epidemiological factors with a known association with development of PPCs. Main results: The unmatched cohort consisted of 9697 patients; 5342 (55.1%) females and 4355 (44.9%) males. The matched cohort consisted of 6154 patients; 3077 (50.0%) females and 3077 (50.0%) males. The incidence in PPCs was neither significant between females and males in the unmatched cohort (10.0 vs 10.7%; odds ratio (OR) 0.93 [0.81–1.06]; P = 0.255), nor in the matched cohort (10.5 vs 10.0%; OR 1.05 [0.89–1.25]; P = 0.556). New invasive ventilation occurred less often in females in the unmatched cohort. Hospital length of stay and mortality were similar between females and males in both cohorts. Conclusions: In this conveniently–sized worldwide cohort of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation under general anaesthesia for surgery, the PPC incidence was not significantly different between sexes. Registration: LAS VEGAS was registered at clinicaltrial.gov (study identifier NCT01601223).

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number111565
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume99
Early online date23 Sept 2024
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Sept 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 39316931
ORCID /0000-0002-5385-9607/work/171065535
ORCID /0000-0003-3953-3253/work/171065899

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • General anaesthesia, Intraoperative ventilation, Operating room, Outcome, Postoperative pulmonary complications, Sex