Risk-related clinical outcomes after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: insights from the Mini-Mitral International Registry

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Paolo Berretta - , Marche Polytechnic University (Author)
  • Jorg Kempfert - , Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin (Author)
  • Frank Van Praet - , OLV Hospital Aalst (Author)
  • Loris Salvador - , San Bortolo Hospital (Author)
  • Joseph Lamelas - , Miami University (Author)
  • Tom C Nguyen - , University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Author)
  • Manuel Wilbring - , Heart Center Dresden University Hospital (Author)
  • Marc Gerdisch - , Franciscan Health Indianapolis (Author)
  • Mauro Rinaldi - , Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent (Author)
  • Nikolaos Bonaros - , Innsbruck Medical University (Author)
  • Thierry Folliguet - , Hôpital Henri Mondor (Author)
  • Torsten Doenst - , Jena University Hospital (Author)
  • Dinh Hoang Nguyen - , Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Author)
  • Pierluigi Stefano - , Careggi University Hospital (Author)
  • Tristan Yan - , Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Author)
  • Carlo Savini - , University of Bologna (Author)
  • Antonios Pitsis - , European Interbalkan Medical Center Thessaloniki (Author)
  • Marco Di Eusanio - , Marche Polytechnic University (Author)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With the popularization of catheter-based mitral valve procedures, evaluating risk-specific differentiated clinical outcomes after contemporary mitral valve surgery is crucial. In this study, we assessed the operative results of minimally invasive mitral valve operations across different patient risk profiles and evaluated the value of EuroSCORE (ES) II predicted risk of mortality model for risk prediction, in the large cohort of Mini-Mitral International Registry (MMIR).

METHODS: The MMIR database was used to analyse mini-mitral operations between 2015 and 2021. Patients were categorized as low (<4%), intermediate (4% to <8%), high (8% to <12%) and extreme risk (≥12%) according to ES II. The observed-to-expected mortality ratio was calculated for each risk group.

RESULTS: A total of 6541 patients were included in the analysis. Of those, 5546 (84.8%) were classified as low risk, 615 (9.4%) as intermediate risk, 191 (2.9%) as high risk and 189 (2.9%) as extreme risk. Overall operative mortality and stroke rates were 1.7% and 1.4%, respectively, and were significantly associated with patient's risk. The observed mortality was significantly lower than expected-according to the ES II-in all risk categories (observed-to-expected ratio < 1).

CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides an international contemporary benchmark for operative outcomes after minimally invasive mitral surgery. Operative results were excellent in low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients, but were less satisfactory in extreme risk. The ES II model overestimated the in-hospital mortality. We believe that findings from the MMIR may assist surgeons and cardiologists in clinical decision-making and treatment allocation for patients with mitral valve disease.

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume63
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85163920695

Keywords

Keywords

  • Humans, Mitral Valve/surgery, Heart Valve Diseases, Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods, Risk Factors, Sternotomy/methods, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods