Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

There is evidence that functionally different areas can be distinguished within the nasal mucosa with regard to stimulation site and stimulus properties. The aim of the present study was the comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical measures obtained in response to mechanical and chemosomatosensory stimulation of two different regions of the nasal mucosa. A total of 40 volunteers participated in this study (age range 21-36 years). Chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded using gaseous CO2 as stimulant, while somatosensory ERPs were recorded in response to intranasal mechanical stimuli (air puffs). Stimuli were released to the anterior portion and to the posterior portion of the nasal cavity. A significant interaction between stimulus properties and site of stimulation could be detected after analysis of ERP parameters and intensity ratings. Thus, the chemosensory stimulus was perceived as stronger in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity whereas this was not the case for mechanosensory stimuli. In addition, mechanosensory stimuli were found to evoke ERPs with shorter latencies. These results underline the idea that the respiratory mucosa should not be seen as a homogeneous tissue. It exhibits varying sensitivities to trigeminal stimulation depending on stimulus quality and site of stimulation. Hence, perception of chemosensory stimuli seems to be most accurate in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity, while sensitivity to mechanical stimuli appears to be highest in the posterior portion. In addition, these differences within the respiratory mucosa may contribute to differences in the perception of orthonasal and retronasal odorous stimulation.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-69
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume362
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2004
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 2442536972
PubMed 15147782
ORCID /0000-0001-9713-0183/work/153110438

Keywords

Keywords

  • Chemosensory, CO, Event-related potentials, Intensity, Mechanosensory, Retronasal, Trigeminal