Responses recorded from the frog olfactory epithelium after stimulation with R(+)- and S(-)- nicotine

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Norbert Thürauf - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Bertold Renner - , Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Gerd Kobal - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether the olfactory system is responsible for the discriminability of the stereoisomers of nicotine. The EOG was recorded after stimulation with different concentrations of undistilled S(-)-, distilled S(-)- and distilled R(-)-nicotine separately in three groups of frogs (Xenopus laevis). The responses to all types of nicotine used in the experiments increased with increasing stimulus concentration. The responses to undistilled S(-)-nicotine were significantly lower compared to responses to distilled S(-)- and R(+)-nicotine, whereas no significant differences could be found when the purified stereoisomers of nicotine [distilled S(-)-nicotine, distilled R(+)-nicotine] were compared. Control measurements of time course and peak concentration employing a UV-detection method demonstrated that the differences between distilled and undistilled S(-)-nicotine could not be explained by different nicotine concentrations.The fact that no differences between the pure nicotine stereoisomers could be found for all concentrations used in our experiments and that experiments in humans revealed similar detection thresholds for both stereoisomers points to a similar receptor affinity of R(+)- and S (-)-nicotine within the olfactory system. At this point, it cannot be determined whether the observed differences in the perception of nicotine enantiomers in humans are due to differences in quality coding by stereospecific receptors on the olfactory sensory cells or by specific receptors on the trigeminal nerve endings. Chem. Senses 20: 337-344, 1995.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-344
Number of pages8
JournalChemical senses
Volume20
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1995
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 7552043
ORCID /0000-0003-0845-6793/work/139025179