Regional differences in soil pH niche among dry grassland plants in Eurasia

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Viktoria Wagner - , Masaryk University (Author)
  • Milan Chytrý - , Masaryk University (Author)
  • David Zelený - , Masaryk University, National Taiwan University (Author)
  • Henrik von Wehrden - , Leuphana University of Lüneburg (Author)
  • Annika Brinkert - , University of Münster (Author)
  • Jiří Danihelka - , Masaryk University, Czech Academy of Sciences (Author)
  • Norbert Hölzel - , University of Münster (Author)
  • Florian Jansen - , University of Greifswald (Author)
  • Johannes Kamp - , University of Münster (Author)
  • Pavel Lustyk - , Masaryk University (Author)
  • Kristina Merunková - , Masaryk University (Author)
  • Salza Palpurina - , Masaryk University (Author)
  • Zdenka Preislerová - , Masaryk University (Author)
  • Karsten Wesche - , Chair of Biodiversity of Higher Plants, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle—Jena—Leipzig (Author)

Abstract

Soil pH is a key predictor of plant species occurrence owing to its effect on the availability of nutrients and phytotoxic metals. Although regional differences in realized soil pH niche (‘niche shifts’) have been reported since the 19th century, no study has disentangled how they are influenced by spatial differences in substrate availability, macroclimate, and competitors. We linked plot-level data on species occurrence and measured soil pH from dry grasslands in eight regions across Eurasia (n = 999 plots), spanning a geographic gradient of 6862 km. We calculated regional shifts in niche optimum (Dopt) and width (Dwidth) for 73 Species × Region 1 × Region 2 combinations (SRRs; 38 study species) using extended Huisman–Olff–Fresco models. Next, we used commonality analysis to partition the contribution of substrate availability, precipitation, and species traits indicative of competitive ability to variation in regional niche shifts. Shifts in optimum were rare (5% of SRRs with Dopt ≥ 1 pH units) but many species did not show optima within regions. By contrast, shifts in niche width were common (22% of SRRs with Dwidth ≥1 pH units) and there were pronounced interspecific differences. Whereas none of the three predictors significantly explained shifts in niche optimum, common and unique effects of substrate availability and precipitation accounted for 85% of variation in niche width. Our results suggest that substrate availability and precipitation could be the driving factors behind species regional shifts in niche width. Studies that address additional factors, such as other edaphic niches, and their variability at the regional and micro-scale will improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying species distributions.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)660-670
Number of pages11
JournalOikos
Volume126
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2017
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords