Reductions in inpatient and outpatient mental health care in germany during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - What can we learn for a better crisis preparedness?

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Fabian Baum - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (First author)
  • Jochen Schmitt - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Oliver Nagel - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Josephine Jacob - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Martin Seifert - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Kristina Adorjan - , University of Bern (Author)
  • Oliver Tüscher - , Martin Luther University Hospital (Author)
  • Klaus Lieb - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Lars Peer Hölzel - , Oberberg Parkklinik Wiesbaden Schlangenbad (Author)
  • Hauke Felix Wiegand - , University Medical Center Mainz (Last author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, reports from several European mental health care systems hinted at important changes in utilization. So far, no study examined changes in utilization in the German mental health care inpatient and outpatient mental health care system comprehensively.

METHODS: This longitudinal observational study used claims data from two major German statutory health insurances, AOK PLUS and BKK, covering 162,905 inpatients and 2,131,186 outpatients with mental disorders nationwide. We analyzed changes in inpatient and outpatient mental health service utilization over the course of the first two lockdown phases (LDPs) of the pandemic in 2020 compared to a pre-COVID-19 reference period dating from March 2019 to February 2020 using a time series forecast model.

RESULTS: We observed significant decreases in the number of inpatient hospital admissions by 24-28% compared to the reference period. Day clinic admissions were even further reduced by 44-61%. Length of stay was significantly decreased for day clinic care but not for inpatient care. In the outpatient sector, the data showed a significant reduction in the number of incident outpatient diagnoses.

CONCLUSION: Indirect evidence regarding the consequences of the reductions in both the inpatient and outpatient sector of care described in this study is ambiguous and direct evidence on treatment outcomes and quality of trans-sectoral mental healthcare is sparse. In line with WHO and OECD we propose a comprehensive mental health system surveillance to prepare for a better oversight and thereby a better resilience during future global major disruptions.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2037-2046
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
Volume274
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85205437930

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals