Real-world management of adjuvant systemic melanoma therapy: Multi-center survey of 51 DeCOG skin cancer centers

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Markus Reitmajer - , University Hospital Tübingen (Author)
  • Elisabeth Livingstone - , University Hospital Essen (Author)
  • Lucie Heinzerling - , Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Author)
  • Kai Martin Thoms - , University of Göttingen (Author)
  • Frank Meiss - , University Medical Center Freiburg (Author)
  • Markus V. Heppt - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital at the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Anja Gesierich - , University of Würzburg (Author)
  • Konstantin Drexler - , University of Regensburg (Author)
  • Friedegund Meier - , Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Max Schlaak - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Andrea Forschner - , University Hospital Tübingen (Author)
  • Lisa Zimmer - , University Hospital Essen (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapy (TT) have revolutionized treatment management for patients with melanoma. However, the current German S3 guideline does not differentiate between patients with and without adjuvant therapy in its recommendations for imaging intervals and follow-up monitoring, leading to variability in clinical practice. This study provides an overview of surveillance practices among skin cancer centers in the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG).

METHODS: A survey was sent to 80 skin cancer centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland on November 22, 2023. Responses received by March 10, 2024 were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS: Fifty-one responses (64%) were received. Forty centers (78%) reported deviations from the guideline. In stage IIB, 34 centers (67%) conduct imaging including CT scans prior to and after adjuvant therapy. Post-adjuvant therapy, 36 centers (71%) conduct imaging according to the guideline. Over 90% of the centers offer adjuvant ICI therapy if progression occurs on adjuvant TT and vice versa. In stage IV, after relapse while on adjuvant ICI, 32 centers (63%) would offer adjuvant TT.

CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance practices differed among participating centers and often do not align with the current guideline. A consensus based consistent approach would benefit both patients and physicians.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Nov 2025
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 105022706637
ORCID /0000-0003-4340-9706/work/204618296

Keywords

Keywords

  • Adjuvant therapy, follow-up care, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), PET/CT, recurrence, targeted therapy (TT)