Real-World Evidence on the Societal Economic Relapse Costs in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Nils-Henning Ness - , Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Dirk Schriefer - , Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Rocco Haase - , Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Benjamin Ettle - , Novartis Pharma AG (Author)
  • Tjalf Ziemssen - , Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relapses are the hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS). Analyses have shown that the cost of MS increases during periods of relapse. However, results are inconsistent between studies, possibly due to different study designs and the different implications of relapses with respect to patient characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: The aims were to estimate and describe direct and indirect relapse costs and to determine differences in costs with respect to patient characteristics. Furthermore, we describe the pharmacoeconomic impact during the relapse follow-up.

METHODS: Data were extracted from two German, multicenter, observational studies applying a validated resource costs instrument. Relapse costs were calculated as the difference in quarterly costs between propensity score (PS)-matched patients with and without relapses (1:1 ratio). For relapse active patients, we additionally calculated the difference between quarterly costs prior to and during relapse and determined costs in the post-relapse quarter.

RESULTS: Of 1882 patients, 607 (32%) presented at least one relapse. After PS-matching, 597 relapse active and relapse inactive patients were retained. Relapse costs (in 2019 values) ranged between €791 (age 50 + years) and €1910 (disease duration < 5 years). In mildly disabled and recently diagnosed patients, indirect relapse costs (range €1073-€1207) constantly outweighed direct costs (range €591-€703). The increase from prior quarter to relapse quarter was strongest for inpatient stays (+ 366%, €432; p < 0.001), day admissions (+ 228%, €57; p < 0.001), and absenteeism (127%, €463; p < 0.001). In the post-relapse quarter, direct costs and costs of absenteeism remained elevated for patients with relapse-associated worsening.

CONCLUSION: A recent diagnosis and mild disability lead to high relapse costs. The results suggest the necessity to incorporate patient characteristics when assessing relapse costs.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)883-892
Number of pages10
JournalPharmacoEconomics
Volume38
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85085104548
ORCID /0000-0003-2465-4909/work/142236920

Keywords

Keywords

  • Absenteeism, Adolescent, Adult, Cost of Illness, Female, Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data, Hospitalization/economics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis/economics, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult