Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in a German convenience sample: Part 2: Cross-sectional patient-reported outcomes after orthodontic treatment

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Isabelle Graf - , Uniklinik Köln (Author)
  • Niko Christian Bock - , University Hospital Gießen and Marburg (Author)
  • Theodosia Bartzela - , Department of Orthodontics (Author)
  • Vera Röper - , Orthodontic practice Bad Essen (Author)
  • Uwe Schumann - , Orthodontic practice Essen (Author)
  • Karl Reck - (Author)
  • Hans-Joachim Helms - , University Medical Center Göttingen (Author)
  • Karolin Hoefer - , Uniklinik Köln (Author)
  • Ulrike Fritz - , University Hospital Aachen (Author)
  • Michael Wolf - , University Hospital Aachen (Author)
  • Dirk Wiechmann - , Orthodontic practice Bad Essen (Author)
  • Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Sabine Ruf - , University Hospital Gießen and Marburg (Author)
  • Bert Braumann - , Uniklinik Köln (Author)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In light of the growing interest in orthodontic care and its effectiveness in Germany, part 2 of this multicenter cohort study evaluated patient-reported outcomes such as oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), oral hygiene habits, oral health beliefs, and potential influencing factors.

METHODS: Of 586 patients screened from seven German study centers, data from 343 patients were analyzed for this part of the study. At the end of their orthodontic treatment, study participants filled out a questionnaire of either the German long version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G 49) or the German short version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP-19), depending on their age, as well as questions about their oral hygiene behavior and beliefs. Patient-, treatment- and occlusion-related factors were analyzed to account for potential influencing factors with regard to patients' OHRQoL after orthodontic treatment.

RESULTS: In all, 222 study participants filled out the OHIP-based and 121 the COHIP-based questionnaire. The mean OHIP-G 49 score was 12.68 and the mean OHIP-G 14 score was 3.09; the mean COHIP-19 score was 6.52 (inverted score 69.48). For OHIP-G 49 scores, a nonsignificant trend towards a higher score for male patients (14.45 vs 11.54; p = 0.061) was detected, while this trend was inverse for the COHIP-19 scores, i.e., female patients reported more impairment (total score 6.99 vs. 5.84; p = 0.099). Analyses suggested a trend towards better OHRQoL for patients who classified for the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index improvement rate group 'greatly improved' as well as for nonsmokers. Oral hygiene habits and beliefs after orthodontic treatment were estimated to be good.

CONCLUSION: In this German cohort, OHRQoL proved to be good and was rather unimpaired after orthodontic treatment. Furthermore, self-reported oral hygiene behavior and oral health beliefs represented good health awareness.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)412–423
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of orofacial orthopedics
Volume86
Issue number6
Early online date26 Apr 2024
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85191341201

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • Child Oral Health Impact Profile, Oral Health Impact Profile, Oral health-related quality of life, Patient centeredness, Treatment outcome