Quality Assurance through EndoCert in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Andreas M. Halder - , Sana Clinics Sommerfeld (Author)
  • Dieter Christian Wirtz - , University of Bonn (Author)
  • Katrin Osmanski-Zenk - , University of Rostock (Author)
  • Jochen Schmitt - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Toni Lange - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Holger Haas - , Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn (Author)
  • Britta Pester - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Elke Jeschke - , AOK Research Institute (WIdO) (Author)
  • Christian Günster - , AOK Research Institute (WIdO) (Author)
  • Bernd Kladny - , m&i Fachklinik Herzogenaurach (Author)
  • Wolfram Mittelmeier - , University of Rostock (Author)

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of EndoCert certification on outcome quality after hip and knee replacement surgery in Germany. The analysis was based on three data sets: AOK billing data, structured hospital quality reports and EndoCert data.Certified endoprosthesis centres (EPZ) were compared with non-certified clinics with regard to the primary endpoint overall complications. The effects of certification were investigated using hierarchical logistic regression models. A total of 1283 clinic locations were identified that performed study-relevant revision surgery during the observation period (2016-2018).The results showed significantly fewer overall complications during hip replacement surgery in certified centres compared to non-certified facilities (OR =0.83 [95% CI: 0.75-0.92]; p=0.0003). No significant difference was found for knee replacements (OR =1.09 [95% CI: 0.93-1.27]; p=0.29).This study provides important insights into quality assurance in arthroplasty. The positive effects of EndoCert certification for hip replacements underline the importance of specialized centres for complex interventions and targeted certification measures in improving the quality of care. The lack of effects for knee replacements could be due to limitations of the quality indicator used, as possible improvements in mobility and freedom from pain were not taken into account. Further studies are therefore required.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-558
Number of pages8
JournalZeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Volume163
Issue number6
Early online date4 Aug 2025
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 40759166
Scopus 105012953989
ORCID /0000-0001-8264-2071/work/203808425
ORCID /0000-0002-8671-7496/work/203813700

Keywords

Keywords

  • certification, complication, outcome quality, revision arthroplasty, routine data