Promoting Work Motivation in Organizations Should Employee Involvement in Organizational Leadership Become a New Tool in the Organizational Psychologist's Kit?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Juergen Wegge - , Chair of Work and Organizational Psychology (Author)
  • Hans Jeppe Jeppesen - , Aarhus University (Author)
  • Wolfgang G. Weber - , University of Innsbruck (Author)
  • Craig L. Pearce - , University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Author)
  • Silvia A. Silva - , ISCTE - University Institute of Lisbon (Author)
  • Alexander Pundt - , University of Rostock (Author)
  • Thomas Jonsson - , Aarhus University (Author)
  • Sandra Wolf - (Author)
  • Christina L. Wassenaar - , Claremont Graduate University (Author)
  • Christine Unterrainer - , University of Innsbruck (Author)
  • Annika Piecha - , Faculty of Psychology (Author)

Abstract

What are the best interventions that Work and Organizational Psychology offers today for promoting high work motivation in organizations? This paper seeks to answer this question in two steps. First, we briefly summarize the main findings from 26 meta-analyses concerned with traditional practices such as goal setting, feedback, work design, financial incentives, or training. These practices can improve both organizational performance and the well-being of organizational members. Second, we examine in more depth a new, increasingly important high performance work practice: Employee involvement in organizational leadership (EIOL). This approach is built on theories focusing on organizational participation, shared leadership, and organizational democracy. We also illustrate recently constructed measurement instruments for assessing these constructs. This synopsis leads us to the development of a new integrative, multilevel model of EIOL. The model includes several mediator (e.g., knowledge exchange) and moderator variables (e.g., self-leadership competencies of actors) that explain why and when this approach is effective. We conclude that future research should focus on cross-level interactions of different forms of organizational participation, shared leadership, and organizational democracy, and seek to identify the processes mediating their interplay.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-171
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of personnel psychology
Volume9
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 79952093032
ORCID /0000-0002-0015-5120/work/142239814

Keywords

Keywords

  • employee involvement, participation, shared leadership, organizational democracy, self-leadership, occupational health, work motivation, SHARED LEADERSHIP, METAANALYTIC TEST, MANAGEMENT TEAMS, SELF-LEADERSHIP, PARTICIPATION, PERFORMANCE, SATISFACTION, MODERATORS, FEEDBACK, LEVEL