Progression Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease: A Data-driven Multi-Cohort Analysis

Research output: Preprint/Documentation/ReportPreprint

Contributors

  • Tom Haehnel - , Department of Neurology, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (Author)
  • Tamara Raschka - , Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, University of Bonn (Author)
  • Stefano Sapienza - , University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Institute of Health (Author)
  • Jochen Klucken - , University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Center Hospitalier de Luxembourg (Author)
  • Enrico Glaab - , University of Luxembourg (Author)
  • Jean-Cristophe Corvol - , Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Author)
  • Björn Falkenburger - , Department of Neurology, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Dresden site (Partner: DZNE of the Helmholtz Association) (Author)
  • Holger Fröhlich - , Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, University of Bonn (Author)

Abstract

Background The progression of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is heterogeneous across patients. This heterogeneity complicates patients counseling and inflates the number of patients needed to test potential neuroprotective treatments. Moreover, disease subtypes might require different therapies. This work uses a data-driven approach to investigate how observed heterogeneity in PD can be explained by the existence of distinct PD progression subtypes.

Methods To derive stable PD progression subtypes in an unbiased manner, we analyzed multimodal longitudinal data from three large PD cohorts. A latent time joint mixed-effects model (LTJMM) was used to align patients on a common disease timescale. Progression subtypes were identified by variational deep embedding with recurrence (VaDER). These subtypes were then characterized across the three cohorts using clinical scores, DaTSCAN imaging and digital gait biomarkers. To assign patients to progression subtypes from baseline data, we developed predictive models and performed extensive cross-cohort validation.

Results In each cohort, we identified a fast-progressing and a slow-progressing subtype. These subtypes were reflected by different patterns of motor and non-motor symptoms progression, survival rates, treatment response and features extracted from DaTSCAN imaging and digital gait assessments. Predictive models achieved robust performance with ROC-AUC up to 0.79 for subtype identification. Simulations demonstrated that enriching clinical trials with fast-progressing patients based on predictions from baseline can reduce the required cohort size by 43%.

Conclusion Our results show that heterogeneity in PD can be explained by two distinct subtypes of PD progression that are stable across cohorts and can be predicted from baseline data. These subtypes align with the brain-first vs. body-first concept, which potentially provides a biological explanation for subtype differences. The predictive models will enable clinical trials with significantly lower sample sizes by enriching fast-progressing patients.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2023
No renderer: customAssociatesEventsRenderPortal,dk.atira.pure.api.shared.model.researchoutput.WorkingPaper

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-2387-526X/work/154191254
ORCID /0000-0002-4254-2399/work/154192400

Keywords

Research priority areas of TU Dresden

Subject groups, research areas, subject areas according to Destatis

Keywords

  • neurology